A Tale of Multicultural Cooperation in Action

Needless to say, there's nothing heartwarming about it.

The story begins in 1995, when headmaster Philip Lawrence was stabbed to death outside the gates of his school whilst protecting one of his pupils from a teenage gang. The gang was called "Venom," and had been terrorising north London for months.


The brutal murder shocked the nation, particularly when it came to light that the killer was just 15 years old.

Learco Chindamo, a Filipino born in Italy, was the individual responsible. Hours after the attack, the swaggering thug was heard bragging about killing Mr Lawrence in an amusement arcade, and his callousness shocked even hardened police officers when it came to light.

Chindamo served 14 years for the killing, before being released in July of this year. He was spotted laughing, playing in the sun with his girlfriend's child - all pleasures denied to Mr Lawrence, a brave man who died doing what he saw as his duty.

The release had already caused controversy; even in modern Britain, the length of the sentence served was seen as something of a joke, but more than that - the government moved to have Chindamo deported back to Italy on his release and failed, because that would breach Chindamo's "right to a family life" which is guaranteed to him under the European Human Rights Act.

Obviously, once again, this is something denied to Mr Lawrence and his family forever.

All this would be bad enough; but a mere four months after his release, Chindamo was arrested once again for robbing a young man after threatening him with violence.

I highly doubt anyone outside of a select circle of elite liberals was surprised by this; but it does raise some disturbing questions, and it does help us to see just how diversity, apparently a positive thing we all must celebrate or be deemed morally flawed, affects certain areas of our cities.

The Daily Mail printed an article two days ago detailing just what had happened to the other prominent members of "Venom" - and it makes for distinctly uncomfortable reading. Of the six gang members tracked down, two are back in prison for recent offences, two have recently been arrested, a fifth is currently in hiding from the police and the sixth simply shrugs off his past as a mistake.


The article details three other horrific crimes the gang (pictured above, a very diverse bunch indeed) were involved in around the same period that Mr Lawrence was killed:

Let us remind ourselves of what Jananto [the ringleader] was capable. Of how he and six others armed with a ­truncheon and Ninja-style butterfly knife ambushed a middle-aged businessman as he parked his car in a ­residential road in Camden.

Their victim was John Mills, husband of Dame Barbara Mills, then Director of Public Prosecutions. Mr Mills handed over his wallet containing £100 and credit cards. But they stabbed him anyway. Mr Mills almost died in the attack.

Jananto got eight years for that offence and a further seven for a mob attack intended to stop a key witness giving evidence against Chindamo after he was charged with the murder of Philip Lawrence. Jananto, we have discovered, is still in contact with two other members of his old gang (we’ll come back to them) as well as Chindamo.

This wasn't the worst thing the gang were involved in, however. That accolade must go to the brutal gang-rape of an Austrian tourist in Regent's Park in 1997. After suffering hours of brutal violence and sexual indignities at the hands of the gang, who were noted to have repeatedly screamed "fuck the white bitch," she was thrown naked into Regent's Canal:

One of them was a certain Cesar Cardenas. Now 27, Cardenas was born in Colombia but came here in the mid-Eighties with his father Gilardo, a sandwich maker, and mother Mary, a cleaner. When he stood trial for the Regent’s Canal rape, he told one female reporter: ‘You know what I am capable of.’

It was not just bravado. Cardenas and the rest of the gang — there were eight of them aged between 14 and 17 — screamed ‘**** the white bitch’ as they punched their 32-year-old Austrian victim, and kicked her to the ground where she was forced to suffer a series of appalling sexual indignities.

During her harrowing testimony the mother-of-two, who lost count of the number of times she was raped, said Cardenas was the most brutal.

Henry was already 6ft 2in with a bodybuilder’s physique. His nickname was Congo after a Hollywood movie about killer gorillas.

Agum was the youngest of the accused; just 14 and 4ft 11in. He arrived at the Bailey full of swagger, smoking theatrically, and dressed like a ‘mini Al Capone’, recalls one reporter. When he was sentenced he burst into tears.

Agum was the only one of the defendants to plead not guilty, claiming he was merely a spectator to the appalling assault, so compelling the victim to relive her ordeal in the witness box.

Both Agum and Henry were ­sentenced to 12 years for the rape. But in April last year, the duo — now both 28 — carried out a brutal robbery in North London.

Wearing balaclavas, they kicked down the door of a house and snatched £11,000 in cash, a Rolex watch and a mobile phone. Police rushed to the property near Arsenal’s Emirates Stadium after a series of terrified 999 calls.

Officers found 6ft Henry, from Islington, North London — a cousin of 2006 X Factor winner Leona Lewis — hiding outside the crime scene in a bush.

Agum, of Hammersmith, West London, was discovered nearby with the loot. The pair were jailed for six years.

People who commit crimes of that nature should never get out of prison. That is the only answer to this. There's no point wringing our hands over whether or not they should have been monitored better; people who are capable of things like those mentioned above simply cannot change, and don't even deserve the opportunity to do so.

What interests me - and the article hints at this in mentioning the immigrant backgrounds, but never says anything explicitly - is just how we have been betrayed, how our country has been transformed beyond recognition over the past few decades. The above is what has been done to this country, laid bare, without all the nonsensical, hysterical shine put on it such as "cultural enrichment."

For all the liberal prison reformers out there, there's also an interesting quandry; if we fill up our country with violent primitives from the Third World, then eventually we're going to need more and more primitive forms of justice and deterrence.

As the article above amply demonstrates, a few cushy years watching TV and honing their fighting skills with other thugs simply does not cut it, particularly not for people who can be described as monsters without the term being melodramatic.

It seems diversity has so many more gifts to give, so much more to teach us - for this is surely just the tip of the iceberg - and this is just how serious it has to get before we're told anything about it.

Mexican Illegal Blinded 78 Year Old Widow in Burglary

More joy brought to the American people by the suicidal policies of sanctuary cities:

A man has been convicted of charges that he beat and blinded a 78-year-old widow inside her Daly City home after she surprised him during a robbery attempt.

Jose Perez-Gonzalez, 31, an illegal immigrant who was living in South San Francisco, broke into the woman's home in the Serramonte neighborhood Jan. 12, 2008, by prying open a rear sliding-glass door. When the woman confronted him, Perez-Gonzalez beat her in the face with his metal pry bar, an attack that left her blind.

Police found the victim semiconscious and near death after they responded to a silent burglar alarm. She now lives in a rest home. Her name has not been released.

Perez-Gonzalez was a tenant in a South San Francisco apartment building that the victim's family owned. An acquaintance of Perez-Gonzalez telephoned the woman earlier in the day and posed as a package deliveryman to determine when she was going to be home, police said.

Perez-Gonzalez intended to burglarize the residence when no one was there, authorities said.

Police tracked him to his hometown of Guadalajara, where Mexican authorities arrested him in November 2008.

Judge Craig Parsons of San Mateo County Superior Court convicted him Tuesday of attempted robbery, residential burglary, mayhem, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse and possession of stolen property. Perez-Gonzalez is being held without bail pending his sentencing hearing Jan. 10.

Just think - if many leading Republicans had their way, this violent criminal would have been in the US perfectly legally. How many others would, too?

Man Threatens Dutch Politician's Daughter

A man has been arrested in Rotterdam for making threats against the daughter of GroenLinks leader Femke Halsema.

He was posting on Twitter under the name "allah-u-akbar":

The 35 year old man, as has now been made known, was arrested on Tuesday. He threatened Halsema in September via twitter.com, under the name of allah-u-akbar. He also threatened Labour (PvdA) leader Job Cohen and centre-left D66 leader Alexander Pechtold, the police said Friday.

The suspect appeared on Friday before the investigating judge, who decided to remand him in pre-trial custody for 14 days. A further investigation will be carried out into the suspect. When this is completed, the Public Prosecutor's Office will decide how the case will be concluded.

Last month, it was made known that Halsema took her children away from the 'black school' in Amsterdam which they had been attending. It is not clear whether that decision was related to the threats.

Halsema sent her twins to a school with mostly black and Islamic children in Amsterdam-Oost for idealistic reasons. "They have now gone to another school. That is better for their welfare. Children are not a social experiment. For these reasons, I do not want to say anything, it is a matter of the privacy of my children," said Halsema last month in De Telegraaf newspaper.

I find the remarks about the school very interesting; in some ways it is heartening that an ardent leftist such as Halsema can perceive reality objectively to a degree and act for the benefit of her children. It's a shame she couldn't have seen they weren't a "social experiment" to begin with, however.

What's sickening, of course, is that she supports policies which will eventually see many more Dutch schools become like the one she withdrew her own children from; therefore, she supports using the children of ordinary Dutch people as "social experiments"; many will suffer terribly and even be killed as a result.

Many of these Dutch families won't have the option of moving to a better area or paying fees; leftists like Halsema are literally condemning them and their children to a terrible fate.

It's interesting that Halsema even admits that to a degree in her own comments; she sees mass immigration and its results as a "social experiment" - and despite supporting it in whatever way she can in parliament and condemning those who oppose it in the strongest terms, the results of it are not good enough for her and hers.

I wonder, then, why they should be deemed good enough for Holland and the Dutch to the point where anyone who speaks out against them becomes a pariah?

Majid Hussain Jailed for "Demonic" Sex Attacks on Mother & Children

In response to an earlier post, contributor Kit wrote:

We live in a society in which it is becoming normal to be afraid. That is what is especially worrying, what people can come to regard as 'normal'.

Absolutely spot on. Mass immigration has led to an explosion of horrific, violent crime on a scale that could not have previously been imagined.

Most people, especially in the most "culturally enriched" areas, now see fear as a part of their normal daily lives.

This sentiment reminded me of a shocking story from Oldham which I never got around to posting at the time. It's from November 2009:

AN Oldham rapist who carried out demonic sex attacks on a terrified mother and her three children has been jailed indefinitely.

Majid Hussain (39) threatened to murder his victims if they reported him after one of them was forced to carry out sexual indignities at knifepoint.

But he was arrested last year after the mother went to police.

At Minshull Street Crown Court, Manchester, Hussain was convicted of rape, intimidation and indecent assault on the 34-year old mum and the three children — two girls and a boy.

He was ordered to serve a minimum of nine and a half years before being considered for parole.

Judge Timothy Mort told him: “The jury, as with me, are left with the lasting memory of those children clutching their teddy bears, speaking in quiet monotone about what you did. You are a man who worked — you are also a man who was very demonic.

“You have no insight what is right and what is wrong sexually.

“There is significant risk of you committing further sexual offences.

“I consider there to be an enhanced risk as you won’t admit the charges. You will not be considered for release until you are no longer dangerous.

“The effects of what you did were utterly devastating.

The court heard how Hussain forced the children into sexual acts and even forced them to watch while he had sex with their mother.

Since the assaults, the children have been afflicted by terrible nightmares.

“One of the girls is scared to go to the bathroom alone, and that the boy feels he can only confide in his pet dog.

The defendant denied all the charges forcing his victims to give evidence against him in a trial.

He was ordered to sign to Sex Offender’s Register for life.

After the case Det Con Louise McWalters, said: “This man has shown no remorse for what he did. He has left a woman and three young children physically and mentally traumatised.

“I would like to thank all the victims for their bravery in coming forward and giving evidence as it is them who put this evil man behind bars.

“No sentence can ever be enough to punish a man who would do such a vile thing. However the substantial custodial sentence given will hopefully go some way to finding justice.

“I hope this case has shown there is a way out for those who are in a similar situation to that of the victims in this case.”

Although I would instinctively blame the fact this individual was imported in the first place, the British justice system must take its fair share of the blame for the fear that currently permeates our society.

Nine and a half years for offences of this nature? Thirty would be closer to the mark, and frankly I'd see him locked up for life.

Whilst we live in a country in which violent primitives without scruples are imported en masse, yet still sees nine years in a cushy jail with televisions, computer games and central heating as a "substantial" sentence for destroying the lives of a young family through abhorrent sexual violence, then fear is always going to be part of our natural condition.

This case was (despicably, in my view) never reported in the national newspapers, so people outside of these heavily immigrant areas can ignore what's going on for now - but for how long?

How long until the British people realise what is being done to them and simply say "enough"?

How many have to die or have their lives ruined before we decide we don't want to live in fear?

Syrian Doctor Blamed "Corrupt Jews" for Immigration Conviction

A reader has sent me this article, from May's Jewish Chronicle:

Police feared a Facebook campaign blaming "corrupt Jewish Zionists" for the conviction of a Syrian doctor for immigration offences, would lead to protests outside a court.

Extra police surrounded Kingston Magistrates Court on Friday while Shawkat Spahi-Shoaib attended a sentencing hearing after being found guilty of using deception to remain in the UK.

He had applied for indefinite leave to remain in the UK in May 2005, despite awaiting trial in Manchester for two sexual offences, of which he was later found guilty.

The doctor launched a Facebook group which drew more than 1,600 members, claiming that the two judges involved in the original trial and appeal, investigating officers and defending solicitor were all Jewish.

Among the postings, Dr Spahi-Shoaib wrote: "The Jewish Zionists are working in the UK and possibly around the world." Some posts suggested "at least hundreds" would atend the hearing. But there were no reported incidents or protests and the sentencing was referred to Kingston Crown Court.

It seems this can be filed under the "opportunities provided by mass immigration" section - just imagine how Syria's loss here was Britain's gain.

This individual has been found guilty of two sexual offences; in spite of this he was able to apply for indefinate leave to remain in the United Kingdom, but was charged with misrepresenting himself (and from what I understand of the system, it must have been a very serious lie in order to see him prosecuted).

Upon being caught and punished for his actions, he decides to blame Jews.

This is the mindset we're importing - and as a rather pathetic attempt to defend the good doctor states:

A Muslim Syrian Doctor with a Distinction in Medicine. Graduated within the top 10 students of his country.

Well, the Syrian education system must leave a lot to be desired, mustn't it?

The same website continues to campaign for his release, stating he is currently locked up in HMP Wandsworth for "ticking the wrong box" on an immigration form.

Would that be the "lots of taxpayers cash and infidel women, please," box by any chance?

We're not told, but apparently the sexual assaults he was convicted of were misunderstandings caused by - wait for it - a cultural misunderstanding. There's lots of bleating about his pregnant wife - who we're probably now keeping, and didn't seem to matter too much to him when he was forcing himself on random girls.

As usual, I'm ticking the "what on earth is this individual doing in my country" box.

Hassan Salahi Murdered 88 Year Old Rosina Waller

From the BBC:

A man who killed an 88-year-old woman as she walked to her Essex home has been detained in hospital indefinitely.

Rosina Waller, of Johnstone Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, was attacked on her way home on New Year's Day and died from head injuries.

Hassan Salahi, 34, of Cunningham Close, Southend, admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

Police said her family could take comfort in the knowledge that he had been "removed from society".

Salahi was sentenced under the Mental Health Act at Chelmsford Crown Court.

Mrs Waller was returning home with a relative having celebrated Christmas and New Year with family and friends, when she was attacked.

She carried on home where she was pronounced dead a short while later.

Det Supt Tracy Hawkings, from the Kent and Essex serious crime directorate, said: "This case has had a devastating effect on the family and friends of Mrs Waller.

"She was the victim of a horrific and unprovoked random attack at the hands of Hassan Salahi.

"While nothing will ease the pain of her family in coming to terms with her loss, I hope that the order will provide them with some small comfort in the knowledge that her killer has been removed from society."

Yes, it's always a "random" attack, isn't it?

They forgot to tell us how "rare" such things are, too.

Not as rare as they once might have been, obviously, but still.

Unfortunately I am not brought any comfort by the fact that Salahi has been detained indefinitely; for I am troubled by such uncouth questions as:

What was this individual doing here in the first place? If we had a sane immigration policy that wasn't afraid to identify objective facts, might Mrs Waller and countless others still be alive or have their shattered lives intact?

Not very politically correct of me, I grant you, but shouldn't someone somewhere be asking such questions?

Oddly, seeing as many members of the public will see the sentence as something of a cop out, the BBC was very sketchy with facts surrounding the case.

Here is their initial report from January 2010, when the incident occurred, which gives us a slightly better idea of what Salahi was responsible for:

The body of Rosina Waller, of Johnstone Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, was discovered by police. She had died from head injuries.

A 64-year-old man was found injured in the house. He was taken to Southend General Hospital for treatment.

Hassan Salahi, 34, of Cunningham Close, Southend, appeared before magistrates earlier charged with murder.

He is also charged with attempted murder, causing grievous bodily harm with intent and aggravated burglary, in connection with the incident.

Now, who was it who said that diversity is one of our greatest strengths again?

German Doctor Disciplined for Politically Incorrect "Rules" Notice

As most of my readers will know, the concept of freedom of speech and association are all but dead and buried in many European countries - particularly when it comes to anything that might offend our new culturally enriching colonists or their champions.

The following story comes from Germany:

A German public health agency disciplined a doctor Thursday for hanging a sign in his surgery that demanded Muslim women remove their headscarves.

The sign made headlines in September, at the same time as a bestselling book was attacking German Muslims for their alleged unwillingness to adopt German ways and learn to speak German.

A demerit notice will be attached to the doctor's name for the next five years in the German medical register, said Cornelia Kur, a spokeswoman for the agency that oversees medical practices in the Frankfurt region.

(...)

The "rules" sign in his waiting room had said head-scarves were banned, very large families were not welcome and all patients had to speak German.

He said later he never seriously meant to turn any patients away.

But what if he had? Is he not entitled to be able to communicate with his patients as he sees fit? To run his practice as he sees fit?

If these Muslim women demanded special treatment, for example the right to be examined by a female doctor, would that be discrimination against the male doctor? Or are some people exempt from the rules that govern "causing offence"?

Why should people who can't speak German attend a German medical practice in Germany and then expect special treatment?

If you choose to live in a certain country, you should make an effort to fit in. I don't think this creeping soft-totalitarianism is helping anyone - indeed it only makes differences more pronounced and fuels resentment.

Hat tip: Islam in Europe.

The Penalty for Exploiting British Girls

Back in 2007, two Pakistani men were convicted of a crime which is now all too common in Britain, particularly the north of England - sexually exploiting young English girls after plying them with drugs:

TWO girls were abducted from social services care by older men, who plied them with ecstasy and alcohol and had sex with them.

Zulfar Hussain, 46, from Blackburn, and Qaiser Naveed, 32, from Burnley, were both jailed for five years and eight months for "exploiting" the vulnerable under 16s.

The first lived at a children's home in Lancashire and the second had been placed with foster parents but - because of her persistent truancy - she was moved to a children's home in Wales.

The girls had become involved in sexual relationships with Hussain and Naveed - and they would often spend the night together at a house in Walter Street, Blackburn.

Mr Taylor said months later the first girl was picked up by Naveed and Hussain in the latter's BMW. The alarm was raised by social services after the girl was reported missing from her children's home.

Sally Barnes, a social services team leader, obtained a mobile phone number for Hussain and informed the men that the girl was under 16 and was officially missing, the court was told.

Hussain and Naveed were driving to Wales with the youngster, to pick up the second girl at an Asda store but the pair insisted that the girls were not with them, said Mr Taylor.

After they travelled back to Blackburn, Naveed had sex with the first girl on the back seat of the car while the second girl remained in the front of the vehicle with Hussain.

The girls were given ecstasy tablets throughout the night by the two men, along with alcohol, the court was told.

The BMW eventually ended up at the house in Walter Street. and while Naveed spent time with another older teenage girl, who they had picked up in Burnley, Hussain went on to have sex with the second girl.

Later she told police that she had felt uncomfortable about having sex with him and had called out to her friend because she was afraid of him.

Hussain, of Cowell Way, Blackburn, and Naveed, of Colne Road, Burnley, admitted abducting a child, sexual activity with the same child and supplying the youngsters with ecstasy.

They were ordered to sign the sex offender's register for life and banned for life from associating with girls aged under 16 for life.

The court heard that the immigration authorities were currently making efforts to deport Naveed, but not in relation to the current case.

These men see the girls - the future of our country - as a commodity to be used up and then discarded.

Of course, if these cases are mentioned at all in the national press, the men are always described as "Asian". What no one will focus on is the fact that these crimes are only partly (if at all) racial; they are, in the main, driven by ideology.

An ideology, in fact, which delcares that anyone who does not subscribe to it is at best only partially human, and can be treated as such without compunction.

This ideology is, of course, Islam.

These sorts of crimes are committed wherever one finds substantial numbers of Muslim men interacting with non-Muslim women; many such cases seem to take place in India and sub-Saharan Africa, and usually involve forced conversion - they are not only a way of humiliating non-Muslims, but also a form of "recruitment".

It's only very, very recently that it's been deemed acceptable to mention such things in the national press at all, so it's probably not surprising that people who rely on it for their information are treated to a (very) sanitised version.

At the moment I'm more interested in just how leniently these monsters are treated even when caught and convicted:

A HEARING has taken place into whether a convicted paedophile from Pakistan should be allowed to stay in the UK.

Zulfar Hussain, 48, was jailed in August 2007, for abducting underage girls in Blackburn and Burnley and sexually exploiting them.

He was placed in an immigration removal centre earlier this year and was set to be deported.

However, he won an appeal which allowed him to remain and potentially return to Blackburn to live with his wife and children.

The Home Office appealed the decision and Hussain, formerly of Cowell Way, Blackburn, has remained locked up pending a final decision.

A spokesman for the UK Borders Agency confirmed his hearing had taken place on Wednesday and that a result was expected in two to three weeks.

Hussain and his co-accused, Qaiser Naveed, 34, formerly of Colne Road, Burnley, were convicted of child abduction, sexual activity with a child and supplying youngsters with heroin.

Naveed did not oppose his deportation and has returned to Pakistan after serving half his five-year, eight-month sentence.

Hussain’ successful appeal against deportation was based on his ‘right to a family life’ as he had lived in Blackburn with his family for 10 years.

That's correct - he still has "rights".

Despite the fact he was jailed for 5 years and 8 months in 2007 and has already been deemed to have served his time; despite what he did to British children in order to satisfy his own perverted lust.

As always, what about the rights of his victims? What about the rights of the decent British people he and his kind live off?

But of course, we count for even less to the people currently in charge of this country than we do to the likes of Hussain.

We'll carry on funding his appeals and the government's appeals, even as more predators slip in or carry on uncaught and nice people like David Cameron and Nick Clegg assure us that diversity is strength and anyone who feels otherwise is mentally ill.

I sometimes wonder if there's any hope for this country at all.

Horrible Histories

The following is a clip from a BBC history programme aimed at children.

It's riddled with factual inaccuracies, but the shrill, hectoring tone and the general anti-British content gives an interesting view of how the BBC views British history - and would like us to.

We actually fund this tripe.

A count of the lies and inaccuracies can be found in the comment section here.

Hat tip: Biased BBC.

The BBC Defines a "Fracas" in France

"MALI MAN DIES AFTER FRENCH POLICE USE TASER" screams the headline.

We have to wait two paragraphs to find out exactly why the taser was used:

Police said the 38-year-old man had attacked officers with a hammer at a Paris apartment block after being asked for identity papers.

He was also tear-gassed and struck with a baton, an official added.

Oh. Of course, the preceding paragraph is dedicated solely to nudging us in the direction of sympathy for the hammer-wielding thug:

An immigrant from Mali has died after French police shot him twice with a Taser electric stun gun during a fracas, officials say.

How carefully worded. He's identified as an immigrant because they want us to suspect racism might be involved - otherwise they'd go out of their way to avoid mentioning that fact.

Also, in what way is one man attacking police officers with a hammer a "fracas"? Fracas means "a noisy, disorderly fight or quarrel", doesn't it? It's a word that makes me think of two evenly matched sides being involved, in any case.

This sounds more like attempted murder. Not that I'm expecting any sort of honesty from the BBC, you understand, but it can't hurt to ask these questions.

Apparently, the incident will "reignite debate over the use of tasers" in France.

I've never fully understood this "controversy over the use of tasers" business; French police officers are armed with actual guns as standard, and I presume that if an individual attacks them with a potentially deadly weapon, for example with a hammer, and they feel their lives are in danger then they're entitled to shoot him, to kill if necessary.

Anyway, the main concern of human rights groups is that this poor dear was stunned twice; but to me, the actions of the police here are more than proportionate considering the circumstances:

The incident happened in the early hours of Tuesday when police were called to an argument at an apartment in the Paris suburb of Colombes involving the Malian, who was allegedly staying illegally in France.

When officers tried to check the man's identity papers he "flipped out" and grabbed a hammer, injuring four officers who chased him, a police source told the French news agency AFP.

I expect that certain French suburbs are already aflame over this. The Interior Minister, Brice Hortefeux, has issued a cautious statement which has not condemned the police outright - but is not as supportive as one might hope:

"From initial reports it seems that, faced with the aggression and violence of this person, police officers were obliged to use an electric charge pistol," Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux said.

Of course, he fails to mention that it's largely due to the wilful treason and gross negligence of his government that such people are in France to begin with, to take out their general aggression and violence on servants of the Republic whilst government ministers make promises they have no intention of keeping and look the other way.

Predictably, the human rights lobby are up in arms:

French human rights group Raidh called for an immediate ban on the guns pending the investigation.

It also demanded to know why the suspect had been shot twice.

Why? Well, let's keep it short: He attacked a group of police officers with a hammer and injured four of them.

What more is there to understand? He wasn't standing picking his nose when they swaggered down the street and stunned him.

What were they to do? Allow one of their colleagues to be killed or seriously injured in the name of strength through diversity or the injustices of French imperialism?

The debate I would like to see this incident "reignite" is the one about why such violent, primitive, unassimilable savages are in France to begin with, and why the allegedly "conservative" government of Sarkozy only ever wants to appease them rather than dealing with the issues they were elected to deal with.

Why are parts of many French towns and cities no-go areas for decent people? Why do the police and other emergency services have to face constant abuse, harassment and violence in the course of their duties? Why are the French treated like second class citizens in their own country whilst their government talks of them as an embarrassment and looks forward to their disappearance as "progress" - isn't any of that a debate worth having?

But of course, all we're going to get instead is hand-wringing and outpourings about "human rights" and "racism". I'm sure the police in question will end up being to blame for not just quietly letting him do whatever he wanted.

It all sounds depressingly familiar really, doesn't it?

Austrian Fined for "Disturbing" Muslim Prayers by Yodelling

The following story demonstrates just how far many European countries, even ones showing signs of life, have sunk in the quagmire of political correctness - and just what power minority groups and their alleged interests now wield over ordinary citizens.

An Austrian pensioner has been fined €800 for yodelling whilst mowing his grass in the town of Graz.

Unfortunately for the elderly Austrian chap, his activities happened to coincide with Friday prayers - his neighbours were trying to listen to the muezzin.

Naturally, instead of simply ignoring him or having a polite word, they called in the police - and the Austrian was dragged off to court.

The Muslim complainants, paranoid to the last, accused him of mocking them by trying to imitate their muezzin (as apparently yodelling sounds similar):

"The complaint boiled down to the fact that my yodeling resembled their muezzin. But it wasn't my intention at all to imitate him," the perplexed man told Australian newspaper Krone Zeitung Saturday.

There is so much wrong here it's hard to know where to start. The fine seems an incredibly hefty amount, even if one agrees with it ending up in court - which of course it should never have done. If my neighbour is whistling and mowing the grass whilst I'm listening to the radio in my garden, am I entitled to call the police? It's simply ludicrous.

The pattern fits; the Austrians have to change their lives and culture to suit the Muslims. What if the elderly man had decided he was disturbed by the muezzin?

Of course that would be a legitimate complaint for many reasons, but if it had been made it would have been dismissed out of hand at best or led to accusations of racism.

The Muslims of Austria are emboldened by such crawling; in August this year, the leader of Austria's Muslims had the following to say:

In an interview with the Austria Press Agency published Sunday, the head of the country's Islamic community, Anas Shakfeh, said he wished to see a mosque with a minaret in each of Austria's nine provincial capitals.

"That's my hope for the future," he said. "In the long term, one cannot prevent people from exercising their true religious freedom, which is protected by the constitution."

Presumably the streets of said cities will have to be cleared at certain times, lest the poor dears be offended by passing infidels as they prostrate themselves before Allah.

The question is, how long will Austrians prostrate themselves before Muslims? Given what's being done to Elsiabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, I'm guessing for a long time yet.

Afghan Murders 6 NATO Troops in "Misunderstanding"

From the BBC:

A gunman in an Afghan police uniform has killed six service members in eastern Afghanistan, Nato forces say.

The man opened fire during a training mission in Pachir Wagam district, Nangarhar province, said Nato. He was also killed in the incident.

Local officials said they believed the incident was not premeditated, but had arisen out of "a misunderstanding".

Nato has not revealed the nationalities of the dead soldiers, but local sources said they were American.

"An individual in an Afghan border police uniform turned his weapon against International Security Assistance Forces (Isaf) during a training mission today, killing six service members in eastern Afghanistan," Monday's statement said.

This is the country we're supposed to turn into a First World democracy - one where shooting 6 people dead is classed as a "misunderstanding".

Being brought coffee instead of tea is a misunderstanding; this is the cold-blooded, cowardly murder of men doing their duty.

Still, we shouldn't be too harsh - perhaps the killer misinterpreted the Koran? Apparently it does happen.

Couple Violently Attacked in London - Children Called "White Devils"

The Croydon Advertiser reports on a shockingly violent crime perpetrated against a young couple (above), in front of their children, in a South Norwood restaurant:

A MOTHER and father left a pub covered in blood after they were attacked in front of their two young children.

The mother was punched in the face and slashed with a broken bottle after an argument at The Harvester, in Beulah Hill, Upper Norwood.

When the father stepped in to protect her, he was smashed over the head with a bottle.

The couple also claim their children, aged just 6 and 9, were racially abused.

The family, whose identity we have agreed to protect, is asking for help to catch their assailants.

"I can't sleep at night because I feel like my children are at risk that these people might come back," said the mother.

"Someone must know who these people are, so I would just plead with them to go to the police with any information they have.

"I just want to know my family is safe."

The family, who are from the Coulsdon area, went into the Harvester pub Beulah Spa at about 6.15pm on November 13.

They had just sat down when a group of five people came in.

The mother said a woman started the confrontation by suggesting she was looking at her.

When the father tried to defuse the situation, the others in the group began hurling racist abuse, even calling the couple's six-year-old a "white devil".

"It all happened really fast," the mother said. We stood up to leave and the woman punched me in the face.

"We were struggling and someone else smashed this bottle over my head from behind, the pain was blinding."

The mother suffered two black eyes and a cut to her head, while the father was treated at Croydon University Hospital for a gash to the back of his head. He has since returned to work, but has suffered concussion, while his partner has been having panic and anxiety attacks.

"I am scared all the time and I can't think of anything else," she added.

"It was one of the worst nights of my life and I just want to put it behind me."

A police spokesman said officers are investigating the attack, but no arrests have been made.

A spokesman for Mitchell and Butlers, which owns Harvester, said: "This was an isolated yet extremely serious incident which occurred between two groups of customers.

"Our staff called the police immediately to deal with the situation, and will do everything they can to assist with any subsequent police investigation."

Anyone with information can contact Croydon Police on 0300 123 1212 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Hmm.

Not one mention of this on the BBC, or in any of the national dailies.

Also, isn't it rather hard for the public to come forward with any information if they don't know what the assailants look like?

Might be a bit of a sensitive subject, I realise, but still.

Can you imagine the outcry if the reverse had happened? Five skin heads, broken bottles, "Black Devil"?

I think cases like this amply demonstrate that the dreaded sin of racism is alive and well in Britain - and those who denounce it the loudest are the most guilty of perpetuating it.

After all, these people don't matter, they're not part of some special interest group - it's not as if society can learn any valuable lessons from this crime, is it?

Actually, perhaps it can - and perhaps that's why the media do their best to avoid stories like this where possible.

Mass Immigration Provides Opportunities

I was discussing politics with a friend a couple of weeks back; the subject of immigration came up, and my friend urged me to think about the opportunities it provides us with.

"Even mass immigration from the Third World?" I asked rather naively.

Of course, was the emphatic response. Think about how much better formerly homogenous countries are now they're colourful and diverse!

Well, over the past couple of years I like to think I've done my bit to chronicle the many diverse opportunities Western countries and peoples have been on the receiving end of; they just keep on coming, however, and we had two more notable cases come to light very recently.

Firstly, in the United States, 19 year old Somali Mohamed Osman Mohamud was detained for plotting to bomb a Christmas tree lighting event in Oregon, hoping to kill as many people as possible.

Mohamud, who the BBC naturally describe as a "US teenager", had apparently been dreaming of carrying out Jihad since the age of 15:

Mr Mohamud, who lives in the town of Corvallis, had driven a van to the ceremony and was arrested at around 1740 local time on Friday (0040 GMT Saturday), about 20 minutes before the tree lighting was to occur.

Prosecutors said Mr Mohamud had shouted "Allahu Akbar!" (God is great!) and tried to kick agents as they closed in.

Court documents said the case began in August 2009 with e-mail exchanges between Mr Mohamud and his alleged associate in Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province.

Special FBI agent Arthur Balizan said: "The threat was very real. Our investigation shows that Mohamud was absolutely committed to carrying out an attack on a very grand scale. I want to reassure the people of this community that, at every turn, we denied him the ability to actually carry out the attack."

The Oregonian newspaper quoted Oregon US Attorney Dwight Holton as saying: "This defendant's chilling determination is a stark reminder that there are people - even here in Oregon - who are determined to kill Americans."

He said there was "no reason to believe there is any continuing threat arising from this case".

An undercover agent had posed as an associate of the Pakistan contact and met Mr Mohamud to discuss the plan, the court papers said.

The agent informed Mr Mohamud there would be "a lot of children" at the ceremony but Mr Mohamud allegedly said he was looking for a "huge mass that will be attacked in their own element with their families celebrating the holidays".

Mr Mohamud allegedly told the FBI agent that he had been thinking of carrying out a jihad, or holy war, against infidels since the age of 15.

Somalia's loss was clearly America's gain - think how boring Oregon must have been before fanatical barbarians who dream of slaughtering those they live off were imported. It doesn't bear thinking about.

There will be plenty of people wondering how this could have happened - and the answer "America imported lots of aggressive, unassimilable Muslim aliens from some of the most hostile places on the planet" will never even occur to them.

Lawrence Auster reports that around 99.6 of media reports did not mention the words "Muslim", "Islam" or "Islamic".

Frankly, I'm a little impressed the BBC left in the mention of "Jihad". Their sideline rather grimly informs us that the US is facing an "increasing home grown terror threat" without ever quite alluding to why - although they are probably more inclined to blame the English Defence League rather than suicidal immigration policies.

But still, let's be thankful that the FBI had the opportunity to take down Mohamud before he had the opportunity to give innocent Americans the ultimate payback for their generosity towards him.

Britain is in the same boat, of course. On Thursday, The Guardian reported that some Afghans are spending part of the year working in Britain before spending their holidays fighting NATO troops back home:

British-based men of Afghan origin are spending months at a time in Afghanistan fighting Nato forces before returning to the UK, the Guardian has learned. They also send money to the Taliban.

A Taliban fighter in Dhani-Ghorri in northern Afghanistan last month told the Guardian he lived most of the time in east London, but came to Afghanistan for three months of the year for combat.

"I work as a minicab driver," said the man, who has the rank of a mid-level Taliban commander. "I make good money there [in the UK], you know. But these people are my friends and my family and it's my duty to come to fight the jihad with them."

"There are many people like me in London," he added. "We collect money for the jihad all year and come and fight if we can."

His older brother, a senior cleric or mawlawi who also fought in Dhani-Ghorri, lives in London as well.

Well of course he does - it's a great opportunity, I'm sure, claiming benefits illegally from the infidel before spending a relaxing few weeks trying to spill his blood.

It's about time the West woke up to just who is benefitting from all these opportunities, and who has the most to lose.

The United Kingdom of Dhimmitude

On Saturday the Leicester Mercury reported that Lee Whitby, an English Defence League supporter, was fined £200 by a British magistrate after being found guilty of "using racially aggravated abusive words" at a recent demonstration.

What were these terrible words? Well, we don't actually find out for sure, but the newspaper article is very clear that the man's offence was insulting Allah:

A man has been fined for making offensive comments about Allah during the English Defence League protest in Leicester.

Lee Whitby was found guilty of using racially aggravated abusive words during the protest in the city centre on Saturday, October 9.

During a trial at Leicester Magistrates' Court yesterday, the 27-year-old pleaded not guilty to chanting "threatening, abusive or insulting" words that were likely to cause "harassment, alarm or distress."

Although he admitted making comments, Whitby said he did not believe they would have been heard by anyone other than police officers or fellow EDL supporters.

However, magistrate Rick Moore ruled that officers were likely to have been alarmed by the defendant's words.

Alexandra Blossom, prosecuting, said the comments made were bound to cause harassment, alarm or distress because of Leicester's multicultural society and the fact the words were said in the city centre.

She said: "A number of people present that day were likely to be offended.

"It was a high-profile event and members of the public would have been in the city on a Saturday.

"The remarks are even offensive to police.

"A clear message needs to be sent out about using such behaviour in a multicultural city."

The court heard Whitby had two previous convictions for common assault.

Mr Moore said: "It is a fact you were with others chanting and police were within hearing distance but there is no evidence of non-police officers within hearing distance.

"It is likely that a police officer or officers hearing the words would be likely to be alarmed and for that reason we find you guilty of this offence."

Whitby was fined £200 and ordered to pay a further £200 in costs, as well as a £15 victim surcharge.

Complete and utter madness.

Firstly, in what way is insulting (can you insult something that's not sentient?) a deity one does not believe in a "racially motivated" offence? This is a free country, and people have the right to choose whether or not they bow down before some stone age moon god, or mock those who do.

Secondly, in what way are British police officers likely to be offended or distressed by hearing a chant about Allah?

What if they are? I'd imagine many of the police officers who had to guard the protest by Muslims on Rembrance Day, during which poppies were burned and the traditional two minutes' silence was disrupted by Muslims shouting "British soldiers burn in hell" were quite offended by that behaviour; however, they remained resolute and professional and did what they were told to do.

This is something of a moral minefield, because the CPS and the magistrate seem to be assuming that all right thinking people are disgusted by "offensive" comments about Allah - but does that notion then stretch to other religions? Could Richard Dawkins be prosecuted for making "offensive" remarks about God and Christianity?

However, prostrating themselves before Islam whilst allegedly attempting to defend our multicultural society (the one they created against the will of the majority via stealth, deception, social engineering and outright lies, you'll remember) seems to be coming increasingly common.

Two weeks ago, West Midlands Police (they have quite a lot of form for this kind of thing) arrested a 15 year old girl for burning an English-language copy of the Koran and posting footage of the act on YouTube.

As others have noted, I wasn't aware that burning your own property was a crime in the United Kingdom - but when it comes to things that might offend the followers of the Religion of Peace, all bets are off.

Apparently, teachers have made sure the girl knows what she did is wrong:

It is understood the girl, who lives in the Sandwell Council area, was filmed setting the English language Koran alight while other pupils watched.

"I think this young lady did not realise exactly what she was doing. In fact I know she didn't," said the teacher, who cannot be named.

"Because if she stopped to consider the fallout of doing this kind of thing, and she considered the offence it would cause to people within her own community in the school, I honestly don't believe she would have done it.

"And I also know for a fact that she deeply regrets what she has done."

We also get the standard claptrap - multiculturalism, this has made us stronger, etc etc. The teacher comes frighteningly close to acknowledging reality, however:

"We informed police of the incident, clearly, because of the seriousness of it," said the teacher.

"I'm very concerned over the wider impact of this in terms of people with extreme views may choose to jump on a bandwagon.

"That is my deep-seated fear at this moment in time."

Wider impact? Whatever could he mean?

Surely not... violence? From members of the Religion of Peace? I'm suprised he wasn't arrested for incitement to racial hatred himself for such an outrageous remark!

This is our multicultural paradise, though - arrested for "insulting" an Arab deity and burning an English translation of the 9th Century ramblings of a warlord, slave trader and paedophile.

Let's not forget, also, the possibility of being arrested for speaking out about these issues - or the implicit threat of violence, always present, that helps these people get exactly what they want, whenever they want it, whilst our own values and standards are ignored.

Funny that someone could be so close to the truth as the anonymous West Midlands teacher, and yet still so far away from reality.

Perhaps someone in authority could honestly inform us about the "wider impact" of enforcing Sharia law (for that is what suppressing all criticism of Islam, Allah and safeguarding all physical copies of the Koran amounts to) - or would that be too much to ask?

Muslim Cuts Out Australian Girlfriend's Tongue (II)

An update on this story from Gold Coast News:

A SOUTH Australian man charged with cutting off his ex-girlfriend's tongue has been adamantly refused bail by a Gold Coast magistrate today.

"In anyone's terms these allegations are horrifying and brutal," said Magistrate Catherine Pirie.

"I've been on the bench for more than 10 years and I don't think I've seen anything like this."

Mohammed Tasleem Tahir, 21, stands charged with torture, grievous bodily harm and acts intended to maim after police found him covered in blood at his ex-girlfriend's Surfers Paradise apartment on November 13.

They found 20-year-old Catherine Cameron lying on her bed with a fractured eye socket, her tongue cut off and deep cuts to both sides of her mouth.

A bloodied knife and empty rum bottle lay on the floor nearby.

Yesterday he appeared in the Southport Magistrates Court via videolink from Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre to apply for bail.

Police prosecutor Sergeant Brian Cazzulino said an emergency ward doctor had described the young woman's horrific injuries as `the worst she had seen in five years'.

Police alleged Mr Tahir, of Fijian descent, had a volatile relationship with Ms Cameron in South Australia where he had been accused of stalking her, threatening her family and throwing beer bottles at her while she sat in her car.

Sgt Cazzulino said Ms Cameron fled to the Gold Coast, legally changed her name and switched phone numbers three times to hide from Mr Tahir but he continued to track her down in a bid to restore their relationship.

The court was told Ms Cameron came home to find Mr Tahir in her living room and endured a brutal assault which only ended when she went limp and pretended to be unconscious.

She told police Mr Tahir left the room and she recalled hearing him on the phone telling someone that 'he had just killed someone' and asking them to look after his family.

Sgt Cazzulino said while Mr Tahir had been in custody he had not shown remorse.

"He refuses to believe he has committed an offence," he said.

Barrister Bernard Battley sought bail for Mr Tahir on the grounds he was the full-time carer of his elderly father who suffered from chronic pain.

Mr Battley said he client would consent to reporting to police each day if granted bail.

But Sgt Cazzulino strongly objected as Mr Tahir was known to have family in Fiji and police feared he would leave the country on bail and not return.

Ms Pirie said Mr Tahir had not shown cause and granting bail would be inappropriate.

He was remanded in custody and will return to court on December 23.

Can any Australian readers confirm if this case has been covered by the national media yet?

Death of PC Jon Henry "Could Have Been Prevented"

Back in March 2009 I reported on the events surrounding the death of PC Jon Henry, stabbed to death in 2007 by Ikechukwu Tennyson Obih, a Nigerian "asylum seeker" with indefinate leave to remain in the United Kingdom.

PC Henry was attempting to protect members of the public and fellow officers when he died; Obih (below), a paranoid schizophrenic, went on the rampage in Luton town centre after having a dream in which he could kill a man just by touching him.

Obih's condition was apparently exacerbated by alcohol abuse and cannabis use; he was so terrified of the country he had fled and sought asylum from that in 2006 he returned to Nigeria to visit his father.

This medical expert advised him to stop taking the medication so generously provided by the British taxpayer and use olive oil to control his symptoms instead.

The deterioration of his condition which followed led directly to the events which saw PC Henry murdered.

You'll be delighted to learn, however (and I'm sure the widow and young daughter PC Henry left behind will, too) that this situation could have been prevented.

How? Well, the BBC tells us:

The death of a police officer killed by a man with paranoid schizophrenia could have been prevented if he had been treated suitably, a report found.

NHS East of England commissioned the investigation into the care of Ikechukwu Tennyson Obih, who stabbed Bedfordshire Pc Jon Henry in 2007.

The report said the closure of an early intervention service that Obih had used was the starting point of the case.

Ah, that'll be it then.

I have an alternative range of scenarios, which of course will never even be alluded to on the BBC:

How about parasites like Obih are never allowed into this country in the first place?

How about their "asylum" applications are actually glanced at, and if they pop home to the country they're allegedly fleeing from, they're immediately arrested, charged with making a fraudulent application, deported and banned from ever entering the United Kingdom again?

How about when those who come here choose to live off of us, expecting us to pay for their alcohol and cannabis habits as well as treat their schizophrenia, they are immediately deported and banned from the United Kingdom?

How about we're allowed to (gasp) discriminate, and recognise that immigrants from certain groups tend to fit in, and others don't - after all, who's doing who the favour here?

I think you get the idea with that; it's just a shame that no one in the media or our government can let the actual, legitimate interests of the British people, people like PC Henry and his family and the others who were hurt by Obih, penetrate their ideological blinkers even just for a second.

Turkish Student Charged with Grooming in Australia

"Coast student charged with grooming" is the article headline in yesterday's Goldcoast local newspaper.

It's only by clicking that headline that we discover the following information:

A TURKISH university student will face a committal hearing on the Gold Coast next year for allegedly using the Internet to groom a 14-year-old child.

Yilmaz Dede, 23, of Surfers Paradise, is facing a Commonwealth charges of using a carriage service to procure and groom a person under 16.

He was arrested in July this year at the Nerang Railway Station by State detectives from Taskforce Argos.

His case was set down for a hearing in the Southport Magistrates Court from May 19.

Today Mr Dede's solicitor Matthew Gibson said he expected to make a application in the near future to have his client's confiscated laptop returned to him but a Commonwealth prosecutor said the future application would be opposed.

Ah, so the perpetrator isn't so much a "Coast student" as a Turkish student.

Obviously, the main concern is that the poor chap has had his laptop confiscated by the authorities; they'd best return it forthwith, how else will he target infidel children and women whilst he lives it up on the Australian taxpayer?

I mean, that's got to be a breach of his human rights or something, surely?

In any sane place he'd either be in prison or on the first plane back, not languishing on bail so he can continue to prey on the naive and the vulnerable.

Muslim Cuts Out Australian Girlfriend's Tongue

Yet another unfortunate example of a naive Western woman paying a high price for her involvement with a Muslim man:

A CHARGE of torture has been laid against a South Australian man who allegedly cut off a woman's tongue with a knife and sliced each side of her mouth open.

Mohammed Tasleem Tahir, 21, today faced the Southport Magistrates Court charged with torture, acts intended to maim and disfigure and grievous bodily harm over the weekend attack in Surfers Paradise.

Police will allege 20-year-old Catherine Cameron was rushed to hospital in the early hours of Saturday morning with a 4cm slash to the right side of her mouth and a 2cm slash to the left which exposed her mouth cavity.

She also allegedly had her tongue cut in half and her fractured eye socket will require a metal plate to be inserted.

Court documents allege the woman had come to the Gold Coast six months ago, leaving behind her defacto partner, Mr Tahir, in South Australia.

She told police she changed her name and phone number to start afresh but was allegedly confronted by Mr Tahir at her Surfers Paradise unit around 1.30am who wanted to 'repair' the relationship.

The documents allege Mr Tahir held her in a head lock and bashed her repeatedly with an empty Bundaberg Rum bottle before pulling out a knife.

He allegedly held it to her throat before placing it in her mouth and cutting her lips and tongue.

Police will allege he then took her into the bedroom and attempted to strangle her on her bed, only stopping when she went limp and pretended to be unconscious.

Worried neighbours called triple-zero after hearing sounds of a violent struggle and police allegedly found Mr Tahir in the apartment living room and located a bloodied rum bottle.

Barrister Bernard Battley sought an adjournment for his client for a bail application on November 26.

Mr Tahir will face court that day via videolink from prison.

As Lawrence Auster has previously observed, this sort of violence resulting from a mixed relationship is becoming a classic pattern in most Western countries - and yet, no one in the media or in authority will ever acknowledge it.

They are selling out their populations in order to enact one of the most damaging and insane social experiments in known human history - and we not only let them, we enable them.

Israeli Student Attacked at Italian University

An Israeli architecture student was eating his lunch at the university he attends in Genoa, Italy, last week when a student from Gaza came up, punched him, and began shouting abuse.

The following events played out:

Assaf, a 26-year-old Israeli architecture student, was eating at the cafeteria when Ibrahim Haji, a student from Gaza, came and began taunting him. "He came towards me, punched me and said 'why are you looking at me?' I told him I wasn't looking at him, and asked him to let me eat in peace," Assaf said. "A minute later he was back, swinging a fork, and called me in front of everyone to come outside while cursing Israel and declaring his intention to kill.

I understood that I have to avoid this dangerous situation. I told my Italian friends, who were eating with me, that I'm going back to my room so as not to respond to this provocation. On my way out I turned to the cashier and told her, 'Call the police. You heard the man threatening to kill,' and she responded, 'It's not my job to separate Jews and Arabs.'

Quite. It wasn't a member of a favoured victim group being attacked, therefore it's simply not important. Welcome to the European Union...

It gets worse, however:

Assaf's attempt to distance himself from the fight failed. Ibrahim waited for him outside and went for the attack. As Assaf tried to defend himself, Italian passersby stepped in to intervene and held him back. Ibrahim took the opportunity to draw a large kitchen knife. The Italian students tried to stop him.

"I saw death in front of my eyes. I broke free and ran into the storage in the kitchen and locked myself in. After a few minutes more Muslim students arrived and began shouting 'Allahu Akbar' (God is great) and 'Itbach el Yahud' (slaughter the Jews). Later I understood that there are over 40 angry students there.

The Italians disappeared; they were scared to deal with them. I managed to get myself into the trash facility. I climbed a three-meter wall and jumped. I told myself it's better to break a leg than to get killed."

Assaf said that he went to the police but was ignored, until he turned to the community rabbi and additional Jewish families for assistance. "We filed an official complaint with the police, and they even informed the local investigation agency," said Chaim Amar, a 28-year-old medical student who serves as a security officer at the local synagogue. "Unfortunately, nothing came of it so far."

According to Amar, the police are familiar with Haji from previous violent incidents. It wasn't his first time threatening the life of an Israeli student, and he reportedly harasses female Israeli students regularly. "It's a matter of time before his next violent outburst," Amar said.

It doesn't even stop there; Assaf found himsef in the position of being blamed and resented by some fellow students and even university staff; the housekeeper at his dorm chastised him for contacting the police as it could ruin the Arab student's life.

What is he supposed to do upon being threatened with a knife, having his country cursed and being surrounded by a threatening crowd singing about how they wish to slaughter his people? Feel particularly vibrant, enriched and lucky to be able to celebrate such exciting diversity up close?

What are these violent Arab "students" even doing in Italy (apart from absorbing large sums of taxpayers' cash, no doubt)? It's quite clear these individuals are thugs, if not from this incident then from reports of their previous conduct and the fact all the Italian students (bar one) are too afraid to back Assaf.

All European countries need to stop importing violent, unassimilable immigrants now - for all our sakes.

Obviously if this incident had seen the Jewish and Arab elements reversed, it would be all over the BBC - but then it would never have played out like that, and we need to wake up to reality and start being honest with ourselves; some cultures, some immigrants just don't work.

But, clearly it couldn't be reported as it happened, because it might wake some more people up to the sheer, irrational, latent hostility which Israel and Israelis face everyday from those poor oppressed mites who build rockets with our "aid" whilst laughing at us, just for having the audacity to exist.

To paraphrase an old saying, you just can't be nice to some people - particularly those who see you as subhuman because you're an infidel and want you dead.

Europe needs to recognise who it's real friends - and enemies - are.

Hat tip: Islam in Europe.

Convicted Asian Paedophile Praised by Labour & Lib Dem MPs

The Yorkshire Post reports the imprisonment of businessman Gulam Bobat for 12 months, convicted of plying girls aged as young as 13 with alcohol, cannabis and cash so he could kiss them on the head and grope them through their clothes in his car.

This went on for three years in Leeds, with Bobat targetting countless local schoolgirls; indeed the size of the "incentives" he was offering reached the point where a couple of the more mercenary girls even began to target him, flagging down his car when it was spotted in the street.

Despite this, two local MPs, Greg Mulholland and Mike Wood, sent character references to the judge on Bobat's behalf, describing him as "honest and industrious".

When your young daughter is safely at private school or somewhere nice and he's not targetting her, perhaps that's how he comes across - particularly if you've already sold all of your principles.

Seeing as Bobat could afford to pay one of his young victims thousands of pounds to endure his attentions, would it be impertinent of me to ask some questions about campaign funding or donations to the local Labour Party?

Here is the full story:

A LONELY businessman plied schoolgirls with money, alcohol, cannabis, and cigarettes so he could kiss and touch them, a court heard.

Gulam Bobat handed over thousands of pounds to one girl to encourage her to get into his car with him and word spread among her adolescent friends and others what he was offering.

Over a three-year period, he picked girls aged 13 to 15 because he misguidedly enjoyed their company not because he was a serious sexual predator, Ken Green representing him told Leeds Crown Court yesterday.

Bobat, 64 of Princess Street, Batley, was jailed for 12 months after he admitted six charges of sexual assault and one of inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.

He was also ordered to register as a sex offender for 10 years and barred from working with children.

Sentencing him, the Recorder of Leeds, Judge Peter Collier QC told Bobat: "You took advantage of their vulnerability and lack of maturity."

Word spread among them if they went for a ride in his car he would give them money, cigarettes, alcohol and even cannabis in exchange for being kissed on the head or touched over their clothes.

But the judge had read a number of references including from local MPs Greg Mulholland and Mike Wood who spoke well of him as an honest and industrious man.

"From one point of view it is a very sad case. The sexual gratification you obtained from this must have been very small, on the other hand the harm you have done to these girls is very difficult to tell at this stage and the harm is perhaps more in what you offered them, in that respect your culpability is very great."

Nicholas Askins, prosecuting, said the first complainant was befriended by Bobat in 2005 and met with him a dozen times during which she said he gave her thousands of pounds as well as cigarettes and cannabis. He had kissed her on the top of her head.

By 2007 his reputation had spread and girls would flag his car down knowing what was on offer.

One girl aged 13 said she felt dirty after he kissed her on the forehead after giving her and three of her friends a lift in his van.

When arrested in 2008 he had £835 cash on him and seven mobile phone Sim cards.

Mr Green said for a long time Bobat, a grandfather, had been in denial about his behaviour and had not even felt able to tell his wife.

Mr Green said it was more a case of a lonely man without friends in a non-affectionate marriage.

"He had the opportunity over this period of time to satisfy his wants if he was a serious sexual predator but the offences did not escalate."

I might be being too sensitive here, but I have some concerns about the way the story is written.

Is it just me, or is Bobat almost portrayed sympathetically, as some kind of victim? I get the distinct impression I am supposed to feel sorry for him on some level.

White men who behave in this way are generally dismissed by the media as loners, creeps, weirdos; a fair assertion, perhaps, but miles away from how this incident is reported (although we only have this local paper to go on; astonishingly, the BBC and the nationals don't seem to feel any useful lessons can be learned from this case).

Needless to say, I don't feel sorry for him; he abused the hospitality of this country, which allowed him to build a life and become successful, by preying on and abusing British children.

Of course, it would be too much to expect the article to highlight that. What it does seem to highlight is just how the collapse of moral standards and the promotion of coarse, shameless behaviour as "cool" or no big deal has affected many young people in Britain, with girls especially vulnerable to the consequences.

That, however, is no excuse for what he did. There seem to be many cases like this, where foreign (and particularly Muslim) men see British women and children as a resource, something to be used up and tossed aside when it is no longer useful; of course, Islamic culture sees all women and infidels in that way, not that the media will ever dare join the dots.

The child abuse Bobat was responsible for was in no way benign, as his defence and even the judge try to make out; the tragic case of Charlene Downes several years ago highlights just what can happen when young white girls who are naive and lack self-respect meet predatory "Asian" men.

The BBC described 14 year old Charlene as the "lover" of the imported monster who sexually abused her and very probably killed her and chopped her up for kebab meat, once again downplaying the true seriousness of the situation.

When will British people say enough is enough and stand up for themselves?

RAF Man Refused Taxi by Aggressive "Asian" Driver

Ironically this story was published in the Yorkshire Post on Remembrance Day, but I suppose seeing as there are now vast numbers of people in Yorkshire and elsewhere who either don't know what that is or are actively hostile to it, that's not overly important.

Here's the full story:

AN inquiry is underway after an RAF serviceman was refused a cab by an Asian taxi driver in Sheffield who objected to his uniform.

The 24-year-old serviceman who had been at a family wedding ceremony in his RAF "blues" was turned away from the black cab by the driver who apparently became aggressive.

Sheffield City Council, the RAF and the local taxi association are now investigating amid calls for the driver to be sacked.
....

The incident happened last Saturday after Kevin Burke's daughter got married at Sheffield Register Office.

Mr Burke, 46, a part-time lecturer from Sheffield, did not want to reveal his son's name who is from the city but is based in Scotland, for security reasons.

But he said he wants the authorities to take action.

He said: "My wife and my son went to get a taxi near the town hall after the ceremony to go on to the reception.

"When the cab pulled up they were about to get in when the driver said he wasn't letting my son in because he was in uniform.

"My wife asked him for a reason and the driver became quite aggressive in turning them down. He made it quite clear it was because my son was in the forces.

"Being a professional my son just turned his back and walked away and they hailed a private taxi to get to the reception.

"It is totally disgusting. The driver did not give an opinion but made it apparent he did not like servicemen.

"If you are providing a public service you should not refuse people like my son. He is fighting for his country after all."

Even the local taxi drivers are incensed at what happened.

A spokesman for the local black cab drivers said: "It is not needed. These servicemen and women protect our way of life. They put their lives at risk for this nation. To be treated like that is unbelievable."

Sheffield City Council said: "On the face of it is disappointing and disheartening."

What I find "disappointing and disheartening" is the typical disconnect between the reaction to this story and actual reality.

The government has encouraged vast numbers of people who can't assimilate to settle in this country, many of whom will actually actively despise it for good measure.

Local authoritues such as Sheffield City Council have exacerbated the situation with official policies about "multiculturalism" and "celebrating diversity" which further encourages such immigrants to not even bother trying to fit in.

Couple this with a knee-jerk hatred of their own history and culture instilled in many British people, plus fairly severe sanctions against anyone who dares to speak out in favour of common sense, and this is the result.

Why is anyone surprised?

More importantly, why are British soldiers fighting and dying in Afghanistan when they face this from Muslims in their own country?

Shouldn't the enemy within, the enemy we're enabling in every way we can, be our primary concern?

"Asian" Attacks Student in Luton

Another late night sex crime committed by a mysterious "Asian" chap, as Luton Today reports:

A 22-YEAR-OLD student was attacked last week after she left a Luton nightclub in the early hours of the morning.

The victim left Liquid nightclub, Gordon Street, Luton, just before 1am on November 2 and walked to the top of Market Hill, where she was pushed to the ground and grabbed by a man.

But the victim managed to break away from her attacker before he walked away towards the Crown Court building.

Det Con Amy Kelly is keen to speak to anyone who can identify the man responsible, who is described as of Asian appearance, around 6ft tall, with dark short hair and a medium build.

He was wearing dark jeans and a top with wide stripes on it.

Det Con Kelly said: “It is possible that this man followed the victim from the nightclub before assaulting her and I would ask anyone who was in the area at the time or anyone who saw someone matching this description loitering outside the club to speak to the police.”

The officer also warned partygoers to be careful on a night out: “I would also like to take this opportunity to remind anyone who is out and about late at night to ensure they stay with friends, use a licensed taxi to get home and always tell friends or family where you are going and when to expect you home.”

Anyone with information on this incident can call Det Con Kelly at Luton CID on 01582 394333 or text 07786 200011. Alternatively, contact Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.

Indeed, partygoers certainly should be careful late at night - particularly in areas with a high percentage of imported foreign criminals who have utter contempt and a predatory regard for the host population, their females especially.

I've said it because Detective Constable Kelly can't.