"Asian" Perpetrates Taxi Rape in Manchester

This crime was carried out by the driver of a black cab, rather than a mini cab.

I was also shocked to learn that this is an "isolated incident." I don't wish to depress Detective Inspector Hughes further, but I really don't think that it is...

From the BBC:

Police have issued an e-fit of a taxi driver who is accused of sexually assaulting a woman who managed to escape from his vehicle but was later attacked and raped.

The 25-year-old victim flagged down a black cab on Shudehill on Saturday at 0100 GMT.

Police said the driver drove her to Ash Street, Harpurhey, where he locked her in the taxi and attacked her.

She managed to escape but police say she was later attacked and raped.

The second attack took place not far from the junction of Ash Street and Cyprus Street.

Det Insp Nick Hughes, said: "The victim was subjected to an awful sexual assault by a man she had trusted to take her home.

"I want to reassure the community we believe this is an isolated incident and are working closely with the taxi licensing officers.

"There is no reason why this incident should deter people from going out over the festive period and I would reiterate that getting a pre-booked licensed taxi home after a night out is one of the best ways to keep safe."

Detectives have released an e-fit of the attacker, who is described as Asian, aged between 30 and 40 years old, of stocky build with short black hair and stubble.

"Respected" Bradford Muslim Abused Girls Aged 11 & 13

Yet more evidence of how lucky Britain and its people are to have been enriched by our Muslim friends from Pakistan; Mohammed Nawaz came here when he was 17 and opened a successful takeaway business.

Apparently his "local community" held him in high regard. Well, lucky for Nawaz that Britain is so tolerant, open and welcoming towards diversity.

Lucky for him, but not so lucky for others - like the 13 year old British girl he sexually abused countless times in the flat above his shop (the prosecution believe the numkber of occasions she was sexually abused after being coerced with cigarettes may run into 3 figures, but we're certainly talking dozens and dozens of times).

Still not satisfied, Nawaz moved on to abuse an 11 year old girl.

He has just been sentenced to 21 years in prison in absentia, because - whoops - he may have fled back to Pakistan:

A man who raped and sexually abused a 13-year-old girl more than 100 times has been jailed in his absence after he disappeared in the middle of his trial.

Mohammed Nawaz, 57, who is thought to have fled to Pakistan, was given a 21-year sentence at Teesside Crown Court.

He was convicted of four counts of rape and five indecent assaults on two girls after he disappeared in October.

Nawaz, of Flockton Road, East Bowling, Bradford, repeatedly preyed on the 13-year-old, the court heard.

Mr Justice Treacy said Nawaz had shown a "total absence of shame, of recognition of what he has done and of remorse". [That's because, according to his creed he's done nothing wrong. - Ed.]

The court heard Nawaz assaulted the 13-year-old girl at the flat he owned above his takeaway in Stanningley, Leeds.

The judge said: "These acts occurred on dozens and dozens of occasions, probably running into three figures."

The court heard Nawaz would use bribes of cigarettes to coerce the child and would sit in his car waiting for her to pass him in the street.

"This shows a degree of predatory ruthlessness towards an underage girl," the judge said.

Nawaz also abused a younger girl, aged 11.

The offending was prolonged and "committed in a manipulative and cynical way", the judge said.

Nawaz was held in high esteem in his local community, the court heard, having lived in the UK for 40 years and running a successful business and becoming a landlord.

The judge made a Sexual Offences Prevention Order which bans Nawaz from contacting either victim and prevents him from unsupervised contact with any girl under 16.

He will automatically be banned from working with children.

You've got to love the power and majesty of British justice. It's a shame the powers that be couldn't have listened to and protected ordinary people, and banned large numbers of people from completely incompatible cultures from settling here in the first place.

That's the only thing that would have protected these girls - and acknowledging the mistake and rectifying it is the only thing that will stop this happening time and time again.

You'll note, of course, that the BBC found time to list Nawaz's achievements as the poor boy from Pakistan made good in Bradford, but neglected to tell us that where he comes from, behaviour and attitudes such as this are shockingly common - particularly towards infidels.

Shocking, I'm sure. Meanwhile yet two more young British girls are given a life sentence of their own thanks to the social experiment being carried out on our country - and they'll have to serve it whatever happened to Nawaz.

How many others will too?

Another British Woman Pays the Price for Celebrating Diversity

There seem to be an increasing number of stories which reveal just what can happen when naive Western women take up with Third World immigrants, under the impression that they're exotic and interesting.

Of course, none of these women will have had a politically incorrect education which reveals just how backward and primitive some of the cultures these men come from are; as far as they're concerned, mass immigration and diversity are just great, and anyone who thinks otherwise is an evil racist - i.e. morally flawed.

The consequences such women can suffer as a result of bringing these men into their lives is unsurprisingly not widely publicised; the media probably assume that society can't draw any useful conclusions from such incidents - meaning, of course, any conclusions that they and a select circle of elite liberals would agree with.

In the latest case that has been brought to my attention, a Kenyan illegal immigrant has been jailed for eight years after stabbing his ex-girlfriend with a knife and a meat fork:

A man has been jailed for eight years after he admitted a knife attack on his ex-girlfriend as she was babysitting.

Jacob Samba, 32, stabbed Stephanie Hunter with a knife and a meat fork, a month after being bailed for a previous attack on her, the Old Bailey heard.

Miss Hunter, 24, survived after being stabbed in the chest, back and abdomen. She was looking after her neighbour's baby in Southall, west London, in May.

Samba, who was in the UK illegally, had admitted wounding with intent.

The court heard the Kenyan national tried to make the mother-of-two have sex with him after stabbing her.

That's because, whatever illusions she might have been under about the relationship, he saw her as a glorified prostitute and a source of accommodation rather than a human being. Did she really think a much older African illegal immigrant was with her out of love?

He simply couldn't believe his luck and her stupidity and didn't like it when the former ran out on him - it's really that simple.

The way in which many African cultures view women, particularly white women they perceive as loose, is widely acknowledged among people who (have to) take a genuine interest in different cultures and their nuances, rather than a happy-clappy, feel-good warm glow about how every culture other than that created by Western man is somehow noble.

The attacker came to the UK in 2006 to join the Army, but was found to be medically unfit for service.

He moved in with the victim and her children after their relationship began, but was left homeless after they broke up.

At the time of the attack he had overstayed his UK visa.

Andrew Hill, for Samba, said: "He was unable to come to terms with the separation. He was living rough on the streets."

In April, Samba was arrested for common assault after he allegedly grabbed Miss Hunter's hands and pushed her over. He was bailed and told not contact or visit her.

On the day of the attack he forced his way into the property as she looked after the 10-month-old baby, the court heard.

Samba stabbed her with the knife and took up the meat fork after the knife broke.

The attack has "massively affected" Miss Hunter, who suffers from flashbacks and is scared for her children, the court heard.

With all due respect, perhaps if that's the case she should be slightly more choosy about the company she keeps in future - for her children's sake if not her own.

Judge Peter Rook said: "She thought she was going to die and was terrified. She was thinking constantly about the welfare of her own children, who happily were not there, and also the neighbour's baby, who was there.

"You told her you would only put down the meat fork if she had sex with you.

"She refused. You told her that if she told the police you would come back and kill her and the children."

Samba will be deported to Kenya on his release.

Another heartwarming story of the success of our wonderful giant melting pot.

Anarchists Don't Understand Irony

Anarchist protesters who attacked Prince Charles's car as it drove him to the London Palladium allegedly shouted "why are we funding you?" and "get a job!"

I'm told in good faith this genuinely took place without irony.

I would say to these scum, whose antics are pictured below, that whatever one's views on the Monarchy, at least Prince Charles serves a purpose; what do they do to earn the tax money that's no doubt lavished on them in various forms (including cleaning up the mayhem they cause)?

The best case scenario is probably roll in for three hours a week of lectures on Britain is Racist, Dude studies at the former Bradford Polytechnic before going home to smoke pot and wallow in their own filth.

I acknowledge that the legitimate protesters have a right to voice their opinions, and in some cases a right to be angry; but where were they when New Labour was squandering all of Britain's money?

Using their Socialist Worker's Party placards to keep the sun off their backs at Glastonbury whilst pontificating to their friends about social justice and the evil Tories, no doubt.

I believe that the government yet again using the money of English taxpayers to buy votes in Scotland and Wales is deeply unjust and deeply wrong, but that is an issue that seems to have been somewhat sidelined in the general noise about tuition fee rises.

The fact is, fees will have to rise because funding the current university system is simply unstainable. What's needed is for that system to be scaled back; we need to be honest that it is much larger than necessary, get rid of some of the more frivolous courses and institutions and return to the days when a university education was a sign of academic prestige, rather than a sign that one is very familiar with drinking games and Pot Noodles.

But of course, pointing that out will only lead to more violence, because many of these people are beyond reason.

I would urge the genuine demonstrators to disassociate themselves with such acts as urinating on Churchill's statue, the descration of the Union Flag and the Cenotaph and the attack on Prince Charles before they lose whatever public sympathy remains for them.

***UPDATE 16:49***:

The moron seen desecrating the Cenotaph is Charlie Gilmour, the adopted son of Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour.

Is calling him a moron a bit harsh? Read Charlie's attempt at an apology before you judge:

"I feel nothing but shame. My intention was not to attack or defile the Cenotaph. Running along with a crowd of people who had just been violently repelled by the police, I got caught up in the spirit of the moment.

"I did not realise that it was the Cenotaph and if I had, I certainly would not have done what I did.

"I feel additionally mortified that my moment of idiocy has distracted so much from the message yesterday's protest was trying to send out."

Seeing as the issue Charlie's actions have apparently distracted us from are giving people like him more money for their education, isn't it slightly worrying that he can't recognise the Cenotaph?

Still, he probably thinks "The Glorious Dead" is a band.

Next he'll be telling us he didn't think it was the Union Flag he was swinging from.

The only thing he's sorry about is getting caught, and it looks like mummy and daddy have got the lawyers and the publicists on to some damage limitation.

Algerian Failed Asylum Seeker Raped Woman in Huddersfield

From the Daily Express:

A FAILED asylum seeker living in Britain illegally has been jailed for raping a woman outside a nightclub.

Algerian Abdul Amouz, 19, dragged his 21-year-old victim into an alley after dancing with her at the Tokyo club in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire.

She told police she had little memory of the attack, which left her with cuts and bruises. But as Amouz fled he dropped his wallet containing his ID.

Despite DNA evidence, he denied he was responsible for the attack on May 9 until moments before his trial at Leeds Crown Court.

Jailing him for four years and nine months, Judge Rodney Grant described him as a serious danger to young women. He is likely to be deported once released.

James Doyle, mitigating, said Amouz had been in the UK for only three months and was very drunk.

Interesting; despite the brutality and seriousness of the crime, he was only jailed for four years. If he's lucky, he could be out in half the time.

Despite the fact he was here illegally and is deemed a serious danger to our young women, he is only likely to be deported; one wonders what he'd have to do to have made it a certainty.

Also, note the mitigation: "he'd only been in the UK for three months and was very drunk."

Does that make it OK then? It really makes you think about what must go on in Algeria if his defence imply that's what he sees as normal, acceptable behaviour.

I wonder if the fact she was a mere infidel had anything to do with it? Just asking.

Imam Stabbed Neighbour in Canberra

I don't know what's more astounding about this story; the fact that Canberra, the capital of Australia, now features Muslim "street preachers," or that the imam in question used to work for the Royal Australian Air Force.

Whatever it is, I'm sad to say it's not the brutal, casually inflicted violence, because that can now be taken for granted.

From ABC News:

A street preacher involved in a stabbing at a Canberra shop last year has told the ACT Supreme Court he could have killed the victim if he had wanted to.

Isa Islam, 37, is on trial for attempted murder, intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm and using an offensive weapon.

The former RAAF employee told the court he had been preaching about the Islamic faith outside the Ainslie shops that morning.

Later that day, he saw his former neighbour in a nearby take away shop.

Islam told the court he believed the man knew who had been breaking into his Ainslie Village room and vandalising his belongings.

He said after his neighbour refused to talk to him he just snapped and started stabbing him.

But he said he certainly did not mean to kill him, saying if he had wanted to he could have cut his throat. [How restrained of him - is this the Islamic equivalent of remorse? - Ed.]

A verdict is expected next year.

It seems that the theme tune of the well known Australian television programme Neighbours was wrong; good neighbours don't necessarily become good friends, particularly if they live in a multicultural hellhole that insists importing Third World people from violent, primitive societies which then acts all hurt and confused when they revert to type - in many tragic cases, spectacularly so.

Yaser El-Waly Raped Blind Woman in Australia

Yet another disturbing story of violence against an Australian woman by a Muslim immigrant has come to light - this one from Keysborough, Victoria. In this instance, the 20 year old lady in question is blind and was on her first solo shopping trip at the time of the attack.

I don't know if this case has been widely reported in the national media (although I can take an educated guess), but here is the report from the Herald Sun newspaper:

A MAN who abducted and raped a blind woman walking with a white cane on her first solo shopping outing will spend at least 11 years behind bars.

Yaser El-Waly, 31, of NSW, was linked to the terrifying attack on July 20, 2006, by DNA matched to an interstate police database.

El-Waly's 20-year-old victim, who is legally blind, was on her first ever solo outing to the supermarket when he spotted her from his car as he drove along Cheltenham Rd in Keysborough.

County Court Judge Gerard Mullaly said El-Waly drove down the wrong side of a service road to catch up with her and then pretended to be from a nearby care facility to gain her trust.

El-Waly bundled the woman into the car and took her to a deserted housing estate where he raped her.

Judge Mullaly said it was impossible to imagine the fear of the blind woman as she was bundled into the car unable to see the stranger abducting then attacking her.

After the attack, the victim, who has partial sight in one eye, led police to the site, where they found El-Waly's DNA, later matched with a sample on the WA police database.

El-Waly had previously been convicted of indecent assault in WA in 2002, Judge Mullaly said.

In her victim impact statement, the woman said she was traumatised, paranoid and suicidal from the attack.

Judge Mullaly said El-Waly had told a police officer he had gone out on the day of the attack looking to have sex with someone.

"There can be no doubt that your crimes have devastated her," he said.

Judge Mullaly said El-Waly's offending was very serious and the courts had a responsibility to protect the public by removing him from the community for some time.

El-Waly was found guilty by a jury of the rape and abduction of his victim.

Judge Mullaly sentenced him to a maximum of 13 years and six months in jail, with a period of 11 years to be served before he is eligible for parole.

It's a shame the Australian government weren't so concerned about protecting the public when they imported the likes of El-Waly en masse, and dismantled reasonable attempts to hinder their invasion of Australia.

I have to say the prison sentence is disappointingly short; this was a brutal crime committed by a predator who has already struck once and clearly has no scruples.

The victim was chosen purely for her vulnerability (and presumably her status as an infidel) by an individual who is clearly a calculating, dangerous psychopath.

35 years followed by deportation would be closer to the mark.

Bigamist Married Illegals for Cash; Spared Jail

A "vulnerable" bigamist convicted of marrying illegal immigrants so they could remain in Britain has been spared jail:

A BIGAMIST bride has walked free from court – defiant despite being exposed as at the centre of a bogus wedding scam for migrants.

Aaliyah McPake, 27, was paid more than £5,000 by an underworld fixer to marry two illegal immigrants within three months of each other – allowing both to stay in the UK, a court heard.

Immediately after the ceremonies the “husbands” disappeared and, four years on, both are still being hunted.

Despite admitting bigamy and making false statements, McPake was declared “too vulnerable” for prison and walked away with a suspended sentence.

Here is the vulnerable lady, born Nuzma Amajee, celebrating what mugs we are outside court.

Amir Ali Tried to Petrol Bomb Crawley Pub

A story from Crawley News:

A BUNGLING thug who tried to firebomb a pub while people were sleeping inside has been jailed.

Amir Ali was accidentally hit by a petrol bomb thrown by his accomplice and then ran into a lamppost as he tried to escape.

The 28-year-old was trying to firebomb the Imperial pub, in Broadfield, but his attempt turned into a farce.

Yesterday he was given an eight-year jail term for the crime.

The court was told Ali and another man, who has not yet been found by police, went to the pub at around 3.30am on May 28, 2008.

Ali threw two bricks, breaking a window, and the other man then threw a petrol bomb. But it hit Ali and burst into flames.

The flames died away almost immediately as he ran away, but in his panic he ran straight into a nearby lamppost.

He hit his head and was briefly knocked to the floor.

He went to the Crawley NHS Walk-in Centre for treatment and was linked to the attack by investigating officers.

He tried to deny he had been involved but had been caught on the pub's CCTV cameras.

The licensee of the pub, on Broadfield Barton, was woken by banging noises and came downstairs to find the front door had been smashed.

Two bricks and the remains of the petrol bomb that had failed to ignite were lying on the ground.

Ali was sentenced at Lewes Crown Court, sitting in Brighton, after previously being found guilty during a trial in August this year.

DC Craig Allan, from Sussex Police, said: "This was a prolonged and difficult investigation during which the defendant consistently denied being responsible.

"However, gradually we were able to piece it all together and this week's sentence reflects the seriousness with which the courts take this kind of behaviour."

Anyone with information on the second man, who is still wanted, is asked to contact police on 0845 6070999.

I must say I find the tone of this story rather surreal; what is in any way funny about any of this?

But for his own incompetence, this violent thug could have killed a lot of innocent people; the smirk on his face shows that he realises he'll be out in a mere four years for "good behaviour" (i.e. not killing anyone whilst he's inside - too brutally, anyway), and his equally dangerous accomplice is still at large.

The only joke is how a once proud country turned itself into the laughing stock it has become.

Muslim Exchange Student Attempts Humour in America...

It's strange that for many people, cultural sensitivity only ever works one way.

Take the following incident which occurred in Niceville, Florida:

When international exchange student Jawdat “J.D.” Kasab wrote “Death to America” on a board inside a Niceville High School classroom, he had no inkling of the havoc the phrase would cause.

It wasn’t a threat. It wasn’t a promise. It was just a joke, he said.

Jawdat, a Muslim, was sent back to his home in Israel on Friday evening after officials in the exchange program he was enrolled in told him he had been dismissed over the incident, which occurred about a month earlier.

“I’m sorry that I did that,” Jawdat said during a phone call Monday from Israel. “I don’t want them to think I’m some kind of terrorist because the people who know me, they know I’m not. I’d like for them to give me another chance to come back and show them that I’m not.”

Jawdat arrived in Niceville four months ago as part of the Youth Exchange and Study Program (YES) through AYUSA Global Youth Exchange. The incident that got him sent home occurred in early November inside an art classroom at the high school.

“We were in class, we had nothing to do; we were joking around and we wanted to do something funny,” Jawdat said. “I didn’t think something would happen.”

He said he told the group he was going to write the phrase, which they often jokingly said to each other, up on the board in Arabic.

“I am the one who translated it, not anyone else,” he said. “I wasn’t trying to hide anything.”

Jawdat’s friends laughed and he erased the phrase moments after it was written, he said.

Later the story of him writing the phrase was recounted by another student and brought to the attention of school officials. School officials asked Jawdat what happened; he told them and was suspended for two days, he said.

He thought that would be the end of it, but it wasn’t. On Nov. 30, AYUSA sent Jawdat the letter informing him he had to leave the country.

Hmm.

Whilst the individual in question may have genuinely been joking, what made him think such humour was appropriate in an American classroom?

After all, thousands of Americans and other Westerners have been slaughtered in the name of such sentiments, part of an on-going Jihad against them and all infidels.

Oddly, this story hasn't been picked up in Britain, probably because it doesn't teach us anything useful, I expect.

Imagine the outcry in papers such as the Guardian if a British exchange student in India made an insensitive joke about the British Raj? Or, God forbid, a British person in an Islamic country made a joke about Islam?

Then it would be time for self-flagellation, handwringing, and many long rants about how evil and racist we are.

Even the American article is written as if this incident is trivial, when I expect anyone telling a joke about Islam might find themselves facing prosecution in several Western countries.

Some jokes just aren't funny, and context is important - but a strong reaction, or rather lack of it, seems to show just what is important to our masters.

Paul Weston Speaks in Israel

Yesterday Paul Weston gave the following speech at the Alliance of the European Freedom & National Parties, which is currently taking place in Israel.

I know he speaks for me here, and I genuinely hope he speaks for many of us.

Here is the speech in full (hat tip Gates of Vienna):

Ladies and gentlemen,

Many thanks to the organisers of this conference, who in these peculiar times we live in must go unnamed, and many thanks for inviting me to speak here in Israel, which is both the historical birthplace of Judeo/Christian Western Civilisation, and the current epicentre in the fight to defend the West in its centuries old war against radical Islam.

Israel understands it is at war, and Israel understands it is both a defensive war and a religious war against mono-cultural and expansionist Islam. Most of the multicultural West, of course, protected by decades of peace and distracted by intensive political indoctrination and brainwashing from an early age, fails to understand this one simple fact.

But the West needs to wake up. Having lived through the bloodshed and carnage of 20th Century Nazism and Communism, Europe now seems perversely determined to resurrect Nazism in the form of radical Islam, and Communism in the form of the modern Socialist hard-left, who appear determined to bring down the Christian Capitalist West via their Islamic allies, no matter what this may mean for their own children’s future.

There are many who will sneer at the comparison of radical Islam and the Nazi Party, but those who do so are either wilfully ignorant or deliberately evil. What ideology wished to exterminate the Jews? What ideology wished to murder the homosexuals? What ideology had global domination as its central theme, for which it was prepared to use violence and terror? What ideology revered its leader as a prophet who could do no wrong? What ideology thought of women as second class citizens fit only for religious study, the bedroom and the kitchen?

The answer of course is the Nazi Party, but I challenge any liberal-leftist to explain exactly how radical Islam differs in any way, and to explain to me how the leftist support of a political/religious cult that adheres to the basic tenets of Nazism can possibly be squared against the left’s supposed anti-fascist credentials.

Europe and the West now potentially face the most catastrophic disaster of our own making. We have imported Islam in such numbers as to make ourselves a minority within our own lands within the next few decades. In the case of Britain, recent reports suggest the indigenous British will become a minority by 2066. But this is not quite the whole story.

We non-reproducing British are an ageing and declining demographic, whilst the fast-reproducing Islamic demographic is notable for its youth. Islam may not become an overall majority until later this century, but it will become a majority amongst young males aged eighteen to thirty within the next two to three decades.

I do not need to tell anyone here about the importance of this statistic. Males aged 18-30 of course, are those who wage war, and history tells us that even though they may be outnumbered by moderates, the fanatical minority are always the ones who seize power and the fanatical minority are always the ones who initiate war.

Surveys suggest that 40% of Muslims in Britain wish to live under Sharia Law. Their massively expanding numbers — which will continue to grow at breakneck speed even if immigration were stopped tomorrow — coupled with their undiluted fanaticism, can mean only one thing — Britain is going to have to fight for its very survival within the next 20 years.

In other words, Britain and many countries in Europe are going to find out what it is like to live as Israel has lived since its rebirth in 1948. Britain is going to find out that being hated by Islam it is not because of territory, of occupation, or of settlements, but rather more simply because its indigenous inhabitants are not of the Islamic faith and must therefore be converted, dominated, or killed.

And again, such a statement is by no means hysterical. After the three-week Muslim torture and murder of Ilan Halimi in Paris, 2006, Israel suggested France was no longer safe for Jews to live in.

And Britain is not far behind. The East London Mosque is host to various Islamic haters of the West, whilst being simultaneously linked to the British government which has rolled over and submitted to Islam. In 2004 the East London Mosque allowed Sheikh Abdur-Rahman-al-Sudais, an imam at the Grand Al Haraam Mosque in Mecca, to make the following comment, which was not of course deemed an incitement to racial or religious hatred. Quote:

Read history and you will understand that the Jews of yesterday are the evil fathers of Jews of today, who are all evil offspring, infidels, distorters of words, the scum of the human race whom Allah cursed and turned into apes and pigs… these are the Jews, an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil and corruption.

Quite frankly, such gross anti-Semitic rhetoric would have left even Adolf Hitler struggling to compete. To hear it spoken with no fear of recrimination in Europe today is deeply disturbing.

The British people and their European friends need to understand that expansionist Islam makes us the 21st century version of the 20th Century Jews of Europe. It does not matter if we are Christian, Hindu, atheist, homosexual, lesbian, conservative or liberal — we will simply be defined by what we are not. We are not Islamic.

So we must overcome our smaller differences in our alliance against the mono-culture of Islam that wishes to dominate us, and the most important alliance today must be that between the West and Israel.

Western Civilisation was founded on Judeo-Christianity. It was born near here, on the slopes of Mt Sinai where Moses received The Ten Commandments, and it is defended here, in Israel, the focal point of Islam’s attack upon the West.

When we call for freedom and democracy, then by default, we stand with Israel. When we call for truth and honesty with regard to Islam, then we stand with Israel. When we call for bravery, determination and sacrifice in our struggle against Islam then we stand with Israel. When we call for the right to free speech and the right to a peaceful existence, then we stand with Israel.

When we call upon God to help us defeat evil, then we stand with Israel. When we call out the traitors, the appeasers, the propagandists and the anti-Western haters within Europe’s political and media class, then again we stand with Israel.

We are rooted together in this struggle, and rooted together we will stand or we will fall. And if Israel falls then the consequences for the West will be both horrific and cataclysmic. We cannot, we must not, and we will not allow this to happen. Long live Western Civilisation. Long live Israel!

American Muslim Convert Refuses to Remove Veil for Mugshot

An interesting snippet from Boulder, Colorado, which demonstrates how Muslims make up the rules as they go along, confident that political correctness will shield them from the consequences of their actions.

A convert to Islam arrested for drink driving refused to remove her veil so a mugshot could be taken:

A Muslim woman who refused to remove her headscarf for a Boulder County jail booking photo has been told she'll have to explain her refusal to a judge.

Maria Hardman, 19, of Boulder, who says she converted to Islam three years ago, pleaded guilty to an alcohol violation and was sentenced to two days in jail plus community service.

She told the Boulder Daily Camera on Friday that removing her headscarf for the photo would violate her beliefs because the Quran calls for Muslim women to wear the scarf except in the company of close family.

A police report said Hardman's blood-alcohol level was 0.19, more than twice the legal limit, after she crashed her motor-scooter in August.

Alcohol consumption is generally considered to be banned by Islam. Hardman said she drank punch provided at a party without knowing it contained alcohol. She said she left after she found out.

Hardman said she was told to remove the scarf for the photo Wednesday, when she reported to the jail to do paperwork in preparation for a two-day work crew as part of her sentence.

She said her attorney spent three hours trying to persuade officials to let her wear the scarf for the photo. She said jail officials eventually allowed her to leave without taking her photo, but it's not clear whether she began serving her sentence.

Larry Hank, who oversees the jail, said Hardman will have to explain her refusal to the judge in her case and that jail officials are preparing a motion to explain their reasoning.

The newspaper reported Hardman's attorney is also working on a motion. No hearing has been scheduled.

I thought the law was supposed to apply equally to everyone? In a case like this, would her attorney have been funded by the taxpayer?

If so, how much did the three hours her lawyer spent trying to argue she's above the rules cost America?

Isn't the point of being arrested and charged for committing a crime that one might lose some liberties as punishment, including the liberty to dress as one wishes?

The questions are endless, but I do wonder how often things like this happen and simply don't get reported - how much is squandered in this way over the course of an average year?

Moroccan High on Cannabis Kills 8 Italian Cyclists

N.B. Some sources put the death toll at 7 cyclists.

Yet more tragic carnage brought to the streets of Europe by lax immigration policies. Yet more innocent people dead.

From the Daily Mail:

A speeding car ploughed head-on into a group of cyclists in southern Italy yesterday morning, killing eight of them, officials said.

The driver had been smoking marijuana, police said.

Bent, mangled bikes were strewn about the scene, and the sheet-draped corpses dotted the two-lane road near Lamezia Terme, in the Calabrian 'toe' of boot-shaped Italy where the accident occurred.

In addition to the eight cyclists killed, four people were injured: two cyclists and the driver and a young boy in the car with him, said Maria Dolores Rucci, commander of the road police in nearby Catanzaro.

The ANSA news agency said the driver, who was only slightly injured, was placed under arrest on charges of multiple homicide. A police spokesman who declined to give his name said the man, a Moroccan national, had tested positive for marijuana.

A preliminary investigation showed the speeding car ran headfirst into the group of 10 cyclists who were riding in the opposite direction on state road 18, according to Italy's highway authority.

ANSA said the driver was trying to pass another car when he hit the group. Visibility was good at the time, reports said.

Switzerland Votes to Deport Criminal Foreigners

53% of Swiss voters have backed plans to implement automatic expulsion for criminals who are not Swiss citizens.

The Swiss People's Party (SVP) were behind the proposals, which would see foreign rapists, murderers, drug dealers and benefit fraudsters, amongst other hardened criminals, deported upon completion of their prison sentence.

Of course, such a measure is possible because Switzerland has a genuine measure of democracy; here in Britain, such a proposal would be strangled long before it reached the referendum stage, and in all likelihood it would never be suggested in the first place.

Not everyone is delighted at this news, as the BBC's article on the subject demonstrates:

Fabrice Moscheni, of the right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP), which drew up the measure, said "people we welcome in Switzerland should respect the rules of this country".

But opponents said it was another example of increasing xenophobia.

The SVP was behind last year's referendum that imposed a ban on the building of Islamic minarets. That decision was condemned by human rights groups and foreign governments.

The SVP says immigrants to Switzerland are disproportionately responsible for crime. It points to the fact that more than 60% of prison inmates do not have Swiss nationality.

Interesting. You'll note how the term right-wing is inserted in its usual context, in place of "evil sods who would like to kill everyone who's not like them" - well, I suppose the BBC must at least attempt to be impartial in these matters.

Also, if more than 60% of prison inmates in Switzerland are not Swiss, isn't that a little more than "the SVP says immigrants are disproportionately responsible for crime"?

It's either an objective fact or it's not, and if it were not presumably the BBC would have refuted it in an attempt to make the SVP and their supporters look like the raving loonies the BBC and the rest of the establishment would like them to be.

Whilst it doesn't surprise me that the opponents of the policy trot out the lazy, tired term "xenophobia," it really couldn't be less appropriate in this context. If you invite someone into your home and they steal from you or attack your wife, are you "antisocial" for throwing them out?

Also, xenophobia means irrational fear; the foreigners we are talking about here are actually criminals, some of them quite violent and unpleasant ones, so what is irrational about being afraid of them and not wanting to set them loose on society once more?

Some Swiss are absolutely convinced this is an attack on foreigners rather than criminals though:

Virginie Studemann voted against the plan. "I think it's sad for our country," she said outside a polling station in the center of Geneva. "It's part of a concerted attack against foreigners."

Which rather begs the question, what would she like to see done with violent foreign criminals who see her as little better than prey, by virtue of being Swiss? Could the fact that 60% of those in Switzerland's prisons are not citizens be used as evidence that there is a concerted attack on the Swiss taking place?

The handwringing hasn't finished yet though; the article continues:

But opponents say the measures go too far. The children of immigrants do not automatically get Swiss citizenship, so the rule would mean sending some people who were born and brought up in Switzerland to countries they know nothing of.

Convicts would serve their sentence in Switzerland first and then be deported without appeal.

The Swiss government believes mandatory deportation could violate Switzerland's obligations under international law not to send people to countries that practise torture or execution.

Shouldn't it really be the place of the individual in question to worry about such matters? If they wish to live in Switzerland they should treat the country and its people with respect and obey the law, then they and their children will continue to be safe from whatever hell-hole they've fled.

Why is that such an unreasonable position? If they're so concerned about their children, they should think about that before doing whatever it is that lands them in prison - and if they're so concerned about human rights, they should think about the person they've victimised, in their own country, whilst living off their hospitality.

We're not finished, however:

The SVP has been accused of using racist posters that depict certain ethnic groups as criminal.

The Swiss political analyst Georg Lutz says the SVP's wider strategy is to capitalise on Swiss worries that the foreign population is too big.

"This vote is not about some complex legal issues about how to deal with certain types of criminal foreigners," he says.

"What most people will want to do in this vote is make a statement against foreigners, and that is the central motivation."

Yet more utter drivel. The SVP's posters are either an attempt to display their message through humour, or an attempt to show just how far-reaching the consequences of mass immigration will be for Switzerland and Europe through allegory, as shown below.

It's a free country, and people are free to feel that the foreign population is too big, just as they're free to disagree.

Also, some ethnic groups are proportionately more prone to criminality than others; I'd imagine that most Swiss people didn't use the vote to make "a statement against foreigners" per se, but to register their dissatisfaction that large numbers of violent, unproductive Third Worlders, largely useless to an advanced economy, are being allowed to change the face of their safe, clean and efficient country.

We also have the underlying liberal assumption that criminality is some sort of compulsion or form of illness, carried out by the oppressed to get attention, rather than a stark choice between making an effort to fit in and behave or cause trouble.

Deporting people who have abused the trust and generosity of the nation they have chosen to settle in in the worst possible ways is hardly Kristallnacht or a blanket condemnation of all foreigners, however it is dressed up.

Perhaps if the likes of Georg Lutz is so ashamed of his country, he should come to Britain - he'd fit in well with our political classes. They too seem to feel that on matters such as these, the plebs just aren't enlightened enough to have a say.

But then, they don't have to deal with the reality of increasing violent crime in a formerly safe country where 60% of prisoners are now foreign citizens. Ordinary people don't have that luxury:

"I'm totally for it," said Emma Link, 86, after voting in Geneva. She blamed foreigners for what she said was rising crime, adding that she had recently been robbed on her way home from a nearby shop.

At least in Switzerland, some politicians are doing their job and looking out for such people. Right-wing or not, that makes the SVP vastly superior to the current traitorous shower we call politicians here.

A Tale of Multicultural Cooperation in Action

Needless to say, there's nothing heartwarming about it.

The story begins in 1995, when headmaster Philip Lawrence was stabbed to death outside the gates of his school whilst protecting one of his pupils from a teenage gang. The gang was called "Venom," and had been terrorising north London for months.


The brutal murder shocked the nation, particularly when it came to light that the killer was just 15 years old.

Learco Chindamo, a Filipino born in Italy, was the individual responsible. Hours after the attack, the swaggering thug was heard bragging about killing Mr Lawrence in an amusement arcade, and his callousness shocked even hardened police officers when it came to light.

Chindamo served 14 years for the killing, before being released in July of this year. He was spotted laughing, playing in the sun with his girlfriend's child - all pleasures denied to Mr Lawrence, a brave man who died doing what he saw as his duty.

The release had already caused controversy; even in modern Britain, the length of the sentence served was seen as something of a joke, but more than that - the government moved to have Chindamo deported back to Italy on his release and failed, because that would breach Chindamo's "right to a family life" which is guaranteed to him under the European Human Rights Act.

Obviously, once again, this is something denied to Mr Lawrence and his family forever.

All this would be bad enough; but a mere four months after his release, Chindamo was arrested once again for robbing a young man after threatening him with violence.

I highly doubt anyone outside of a select circle of elite liberals was surprised by this; but it does raise some disturbing questions, and it does help us to see just how diversity, apparently a positive thing we all must celebrate or be deemed morally flawed, affects certain areas of our cities.

The Daily Mail printed an article two days ago detailing just what had happened to the other prominent members of "Venom" - and it makes for distinctly uncomfortable reading. Of the six gang members tracked down, two are back in prison for recent offences, two have recently been arrested, a fifth is currently in hiding from the police and the sixth simply shrugs off his past as a mistake.


The article details three other horrific crimes the gang (pictured above, a very diverse bunch indeed) were involved in around the same period that Mr Lawrence was killed:

Let us remind ourselves of what Jananto [the ringleader] was capable. Of how he and six others armed with a ­truncheon and Ninja-style butterfly knife ambushed a middle-aged businessman as he parked his car in a ­residential road in Camden.

Their victim was John Mills, husband of Dame Barbara Mills, then Director of Public Prosecutions. Mr Mills handed over his wallet containing £100 and credit cards. But they stabbed him anyway. Mr Mills almost died in the attack.

Jananto got eight years for that offence and a further seven for a mob attack intended to stop a key witness giving evidence against Chindamo after he was charged with the murder of Philip Lawrence. Jananto, we have discovered, is still in contact with two other members of his old gang (we’ll come back to them) as well as Chindamo.

This wasn't the worst thing the gang were involved in, however. That accolade must go to the brutal gang-rape of an Austrian tourist in Regent's Park in 1997. After suffering hours of brutal violence and sexual indignities at the hands of the gang, who were noted to have repeatedly screamed "fuck the white bitch," she was thrown naked into Regent's Canal:

One of them was a certain Cesar Cardenas. Now 27, Cardenas was born in Colombia but came here in the mid-Eighties with his father Gilardo, a sandwich maker, and mother Mary, a cleaner. When he stood trial for the Regent’s Canal rape, he told one female reporter: ‘You know what I am capable of.’

It was not just bravado. Cardenas and the rest of the gang — there were eight of them aged between 14 and 17 — screamed ‘**** the white bitch’ as they punched their 32-year-old Austrian victim, and kicked her to the ground where she was forced to suffer a series of appalling sexual indignities.

During her harrowing testimony the mother-of-two, who lost count of the number of times she was raped, said Cardenas was the most brutal.

Henry was already 6ft 2in with a bodybuilder’s physique. His nickname was Congo after a Hollywood movie about killer gorillas.

Agum was the youngest of the accused; just 14 and 4ft 11in. He arrived at the Bailey full of swagger, smoking theatrically, and dressed like a ‘mini Al Capone’, recalls one reporter. When he was sentenced he burst into tears.

Agum was the only one of the defendants to plead not guilty, claiming he was merely a spectator to the appalling assault, so compelling the victim to relive her ordeal in the witness box.

Both Agum and Henry were ­sentenced to 12 years for the rape. But in April last year, the duo — now both 28 — carried out a brutal robbery in North London.

Wearing balaclavas, they kicked down the door of a house and snatched £11,000 in cash, a Rolex watch and a mobile phone. Police rushed to the property near Arsenal’s Emirates Stadium after a series of terrified 999 calls.

Officers found 6ft Henry, from Islington, North London — a cousin of 2006 X Factor winner Leona Lewis — hiding outside the crime scene in a bush.

Agum, of Hammersmith, West London, was discovered nearby with the loot. The pair were jailed for six years.

People who commit crimes of that nature should never get out of prison. That is the only answer to this. There's no point wringing our hands over whether or not they should have been monitored better; people who are capable of things like those mentioned above simply cannot change, and don't even deserve the opportunity to do so.

What interests me - and the article hints at this in mentioning the immigrant backgrounds, but never says anything explicitly - is just how we have been betrayed, how our country has been transformed beyond recognition over the past few decades. The above is what has been done to this country, laid bare, without all the nonsensical, hysterical shine put on it such as "cultural enrichment."

For all the liberal prison reformers out there, there's also an interesting quandry; if we fill up our country with violent primitives from the Third World, then eventually we're going to need more and more primitive forms of justice and deterrence.

As the article above amply demonstrates, a few cushy years watching TV and honing their fighting skills with other thugs simply does not cut it, particularly not for people who can be described as monsters without the term being melodramatic.

It seems diversity has so many more gifts to give, so much more to teach us - for this is surely just the tip of the iceberg - and this is just how serious it has to get before we're told anything about it.

Mexican Illegal Blinded 78 Year Old Widow in Burglary

More joy brought to the American people by the suicidal policies of sanctuary cities:

A man has been convicted of charges that he beat and blinded a 78-year-old widow inside her Daly City home after she surprised him during a robbery attempt.

Jose Perez-Gonzalez, 31, an illegal immigrant who was living in South San Francisco, broke into the woman's home in the Serramonte neighborhood Jan. 12, 2008, by prying open a rear sliding-glass door. When the woman confronted him, Perez-Gonzalez beat her in the face with his metal pry bar, an attack that left her blind.

Police found the victim semiconscious and near death after they responded to a silent burglar alarm. She now lives in a rest home. Her name has not been released.

Perez-Gonzalez was a tenant in a South San Francisco apartment building that the victim's family owned. An acquaintance of Perez-Gonzalez telephoned the woman earlier in the day and posed as a package deliveryman to determine when she was going to be home, police said.

Perez-Gonzalez intended to burglarize the residence when no one was there, authorities said.

Police tracked him to his hometown of Guadalajara, where Mexican authorities arrested him in November 2008.

Judge Craig Parsons of San Mateo County Superior Court convicted him Tuesday of attempted robbery, residential burglary, mayhem, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse and possession of stolen property. Perez-Gonzalez is being held without bail pending his sentencing hearing Jan. 10.

Just think - if many leading Republicans had their way, this violent criminal would have been in the US perfectly legally. How many others would, too?

Man Threatens Dutch Politician's Daughter

A man has been arrested in Rotterdam for making threats against the daughter of GroenLinks leader Femke Halsema.

He was posting on Twitter under the name "allah-u-akbar":

The 35 year old man, as has now been made known, was arrested on Tuesday. He threatened Halsema in September via twitter.com, under the name of allah-u-akbar. He also threatened Labour (PvdA) leader Job Cohen and centre-left D66 leader Alexander Pechtold, the police said Friday.

The suspect appeared on Friday before the investigating judge, who decided to remand him in pre-trial custody for 14 days. A further investigation will be carried out into the suspect. When this is completed, the Public Prosecutor's Office will decide how the case will be concluded.

Last month, it was made known that Halsema took her children away from the 'black school' in Amsterdam which they had been attending. It is not clear whether that decision was related to the threats.

Halsema sent her twins to a school with mostly black and Islamic children in Amsterdam-Oost for idealistic reasons. "They have now gone to another school. That is better for their welfare. Children are not a social experiment. For these reasons, I do not want to say anything, it is a matter of the privacy of my children," said Halsema last month in De Telegraaf newspaper.

I find the remarks about the school very interesting; in some ways it is heartening that an ardent leftist such as Halsema can perceive reality objectively to a degree and act for the benefit of her children. It's a shame she couldn't have seen they weren't a "social experiment" to begin with, however.

What's sickening, of course, is that she supports policies which will eventually see many more Dutch schools become like the one she withdrew her own children from; therefore, she supports using the children of ordinary Dutch people as "social experiments"; many will suffer terribly and even be killed as a result.

Many of these Dutch families won't have the option of moving to a better area or paying fees; leftists like Halsema are literally condemning them and their children to a terrible fate.

It's interesting that Halsema even admits that to a degree in her own comments; she sees mass immigration and its results as a "social experiment" - and despite supporting it in whatever way she can in parliament and condemning those who oppose it in the strongest terms, the results of it are not good enough for her and hers.

I wonder, then, why they should be deemed good enough for Holland and the Dutch to the point where anyone who speaks out against them becomes a pariah?

Majid Hussain Jailed for "Demonic" Sex Attacks on Mother & Children

In response to an earlier post, contributor Kit wrote:

We live in a society in which it is becoming normal to be afraid. That is what is especially worrying, what people can come to regard as 'normal'.

Absolutely spot on. Mass immigration has led to an explosion of horrific, violent crime on a scale that could not have previously been imagined.

Most people, especially in the most "culturally enriched" areas, now see fear as a part of their normal daily lives.

This sentiment reminded me of a shocking story from Oldham which I never got around to posting at the time. It's from November 2009:

AN Oldham rapist who carried out demonic sex attacks on a terrified mother and her three children has been jailed indefinitely.

Majid Hussain (39) threatened to murder his victims if they reported him after one of them was forced to carry out sexual indignities at knifepoint.

But he was arrested last year after the mother went to police.

At Minshull Street Crown Court, Manchester, Hussain was convicted of rape, intimidation and indecent assault on the 34-year old mum and the three children — two girls and a boy.

He was ordered to serve a minimum of nine and a half years before being considered for parole.

Judge Timothy Mort told him: “The jury, as with me, are left with the lasting memory of those children clutching their teddy bears, speaking in quiet monotone about what you did. You are a man who worked — you are also a man who was very demonic.

“You have no insight what is right and what is wrong sexually.

“There is significant risk of you committing further sexual offences.

“I consider there to be an enhanced risk as you won’t admit the charges. You will not be considered for release until you are no longer dangerous.

“The effects of what you did were utterly devastating.

The court heard how Hussain forced the children into sexual acts and even forced them to watch while he had sex with their mother.

Since the assaults, the children have been afflicted by terrible nightmares.

“One of the girls is scared to go to the bathroom alone, and that the boy feels he can only confide in his pet dog.

The defendant denied all the charges forcing his victims to give evidence against him in a trial.

He was ordered to sign to Sex Offender’s Register for life.

After the case Det Con Louise McWalters, said: “This man has shown no remorse for what he did. He has left a woman and three young children physically and mentally traumatised.

“I would like to thank all the victims for their bravery in coming forward and giving evidence as it is them who put this evil man behind bars.

“No sentence can ever be enough to punish a man who would do such a vile thing. However the substantial custodial sentence given will hopefully go some way to finding justice.

“I hope this case has shown there is a way out for those who are in a similar situation to that of the victims in this case.”

Although I would instinctively blame the fact this individual was imported in the first place, the British justice system must take its fair share of the blame for the fear that currently permeates our society.

Nine and a half years for offences of this nature? Thirty would be closer to the mark, and frankly I'd see him locked up for life.

Whilst we live in a country in which violent primitives without scruples are imported en masse, yet still sees nine years in a cushy jail with televisions, computer games and central heating as a "substantial" sentence for destroying the lives of a young family through abhorrent sexual violence, then fear is always going to be part of our natural condition.

This case was (despicably, in my view) never reported in the national newspapers, so people outside of these heavily immigrant areas can ignore what's going on for now - but for how long?

How long until the British people realise what is being done to them and simply say "enough"?

How many have to die or have their lives ruined before we decide we don't want to live in fear?

Syrian Doctor Blamed "Corrupt Jews" for Immigration Conviction

A reader has sent me this article, from May's Jewish Chronicle:

Police feared a Facebook campaign blaming "corrupt Jewish Zionists" for the conviction of a Syrian doctor for immigration offences, would lead to protests outside a court.

Extra police surrounded Kingston Magistrates Court on Friday while Shawkat Spahi-Shoaib attended a sentencing hearing after being found guilty of using deception to remain in the UK.

He had applied for indefinite leave to remain in the UK in May 2005, despite awaiting trial in Manchester for two sexual offences, of which he was later found guilty.

The doctor launched a Facebook group which drew more than 1,600 members, claiming that the two judges involved in the original trial and appeal, investigating officers and defending solicitor were all Jewish.

Among the postings, Dr Spahi-Shoaib wrote: "The Jewish Zionists are working in the UK and possibly around the world." Some posts suggested "at least hundreds" would atend the hearing. But there were no reported incidents or protests and the sentencing was referred to Kingston Crown Court.

It seems this can be filed under the "opportunities provided by mass immigration" section - just imagine how Syria's loss here was Britain's gain.

This individual has been found guilty of two sexual offences; in spite of this he was able to apply for indefinate leave to remain in the United Kingdom, but was charged with misrepresenting himself (and from what I understand of the system, it must have been a very serious lie in order to see him prosecuted).

Upon being caught and punished for his actions, he decides to blame Jews.

This is the mindset we're importing - and as a rather pathetic attempt to defend the good doctor states:

A Muslim Syrian Doctor with a Distinction in Medicine. Graduated within the top 10 students of his country.

Well, the Syrian education system must leave a lot to be desired, mustn't it?

The same website continues to campaign for his release, stating he is currently locked up in HMP Wandsworth for "ticking the wrong box" on an immigration form.

Would that be the "lots of taxpayers cash and infidel women, please," box by any chance?

We're not told, but apparently the sexual assaults he was convicted of were misunderstandings caused by - wait for it - a cultural misunderstanding. There's lots of bleating about his pregnant wife - who we're probably now keeping, and didn't seem to matter too much to him when he was forcing himself on random girls.

As usual, I'm ticking the "what on earth is this individual doing in my country" box.

Hassan Salahi Murdered 88 Year Old Rosina Waller

From the BBC:

A man who killed an 88-year-old woman as she walked to her Essex home has been detained in hospital indefinitely.

Rosina Waller, of Johnstone Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, was attacked on her way home on New Year's Day and died from head injuries.

Hassan Salahi, 34, of Cunningham Close, Southend, admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

Police said her family could take comfort in the knowledge that he had been "removed from society".

Salahi was sentenced under the Mental Health Act at Chelmsford Crown Court.

Mrs Waller was returning home with a relative having celebrated Christmas and New Year with family and friends, when she was attacked.

She carried on home where she was pronounced dead a short while later.

Det Supt Tracy Hawkings, from the Kent and Essex serious crime directorate, said: "This case has had a devastating effect on the family and friends of Mrs Waller.

"She was the victim of a horrific and unprovoked random attack at the hands of Hassan Salahi.

"While nothing will ease the pain of her family in coming to terms with her loss, I hope that the order will provide them with some small comfort in the knowledge that her killer has been removed from society."

Yes, it's always a "random" attack, isn't it?

They forgot to tell us how "rare" such things are, too.

Not as rare as they once might have been, obviously, but still.

Unfortunately I am not brought any comfort by the fact that Salahi has been detained indefinitely; for I am troubled by such uncouth questions as:

What was this individual doing here in the first place? If we had a sane immigration policy that wasn't afraid to identify objective facts, might Mrs Waller and countless others still be alive or have their shattered lives intact?

Not very politically correct of me, I grant you, but shouldn't someone somewhere be asking such questions?

Oddly, seeing as many members of the public will see the sentence as something of a cop out, the BBC was very sketchy with facts surrounding the case.

Here is their initial report from January 2010, when the incident occurred, which gives us a slightly better idea of what Salahi was responsible for:

The body of Rosina Waller, of Johnstone Road, Thorpe Bay, Southend, was discovered by police. She had died from head injuries.

A 64-year-old man was found injured in the house. He was taken to Southend General Hospital for treatment.

Hassan Salahi, 34, of Cunningham Close, Southend, appeared before magistrates earlier charged with murder.

He is also charged with attempted murder, causing grievous bodily harm with intent and aggravated burglary, in connection with the incident.

Now, who was it who said that diversity is one of our greatest strengths again?

German Doctor Disciplined for Politically Incorrect "Rules" Notice

As most of my readers will know, the concept of freedom of speech and association are all but dead and buried in many European countries - particularly when it comes to anything that might offend our new culturally enriching colonists or their champions.

The following story comes from Germany:

A German public health agency disciplined a doctor Thursday for hanging a sign in his surgery that demanded Muslim women remove their headscarves.

The sign made headlines in September, at the same time as a bestselling book was attacking German Muslims for their alleged unwillingness to adopt German ways and learn to speak German.

A demerit notice will be attached to the doctor's name for the next five years in the German medical register, said Cornelia Kur, a spokeswoman for the agency that oversees medical practices in the Frankfurt region.

(...)

The "rules" sign in his waiting room had said head-scarves were banned, very large families were not welcome and all patients had to speak German.

He said later he never seriously meant to turn any patients away.

But what if he had? Is he not entitled to be able to communicate with his patients as he sees fit? To run his practice as he sees fit?

If these Muslim women demanded special treatment, for example the right to be examined by a female doctor, would that be discrimination against the male doctor? Or are some people exempt from the rules that govern "causing offence"?

Why should people who can't speak German attend a German medical practice in Germany and then expect special treatment?

If you choose to live in a certain country, you should make an effort to fit in. I don't think this creeping soft-totalitarianism is helping anyone - indeed it only makes differences more pronounced and fuels resentment.

Hat tip: Islam in Europe.