The Penalty for Exploiting British Girls

Back in 2007, two Pakistani men were convicted of a crime which is now all too common in Britain, particularly the north of England - sexually exploiting young English girls after plying them with drugs:

TWO girls were abducted from social services care by older men, who plied them with ecstasy and alcohol and had sex with them.

Zulfar Hussain, 46, from Blackburn, and Qaiser Naveed, 32, from Burnley, were both jailed for five years and eight months for "exploiting" the vulnerable under 16s.

The first lived at a children's home in Lancashire and the second had been placed with foster parents but - because of her persistent truancy - she was moved to a children's home in Wales.

The girls had become involved in sexual relationships with Hussain and Naveed - and they would often spend the night together at a house in Walter Street, Blackburn.

Mr Taylor said months later the first girl was picked up by Naveed and Hussain in the latter's BMW. The alarm was raised by social services after the girl was reported missing from her children's home.

Sally Barnes, a social services team leader, obtained a mobile phone number for Hussain and informed the men that the girl was under 16 and was officially missing, the court was told.

Hussain and Naveed were driving to Wales with the youngster, to pick up the second girl at an Asda store but the pair insisted that the girls were not with them, said Mr Taylor.

After they travelled back to Blackburn, Naveed had sex with the first girl on the back seat of the car while the second girl remained in the front of the vehicle with Hussain.

The girls were given ecstasy tablets throughout the night by the two men, along with alcohol, the court was told.

The BMW eventually ended up at the house in Walter Street. and while Naveed spent time with another older teenage girl, who they had picked up in Burnley, Hussain went on to have sex with the second girl.

Later she told police that she had felt uncomfortable about having sex with him and had called out to her friend because she was afraid of him.

Hussain, of Cowell Way, Blackburn, and Naveed, of Colne Road, Burnley, admitted abducting a child, sexual activity with the same child and supplying the youngsters with ecstasy.

They were ordered to sign the sex offender's register for life and banned for life from associating with girls aged under 16 for life.

The court heard that the immigration authorities were currently making efforts to deport Naveed, but not in relation to the current case.

These men see the girls - the future of our country - as a commodity to be used up and then discarded.

Of course, if these cases are mentioned at all in the national press, the men are always described as "Asian". What no one will focus on is the fact that these crimes are only partly (if at all) racial; they are, in the main, driven by ideology.

An ideology, in fact, which delcares that anyone who does not subscribe to it is at best only partially human, and can be treated as such without compunction.

This ideology is, of course, Islam.

These sorts of crimes are committed wherever one finds substantial numbers of Muslim men interacting with non-Muslim women; many such cases seem to take place in India and sub-Saharan Africa, and usually involve forced conversion - they are not only a way of humiliating non-Muslims, but also a form of "recruitment".

It's only very, very recently that it's been deemed acceptable to mention such things in the national press at all, so it's probably not surprising that people who rely on it for their information are treated to a (very) sanitised version.

At the moment I'm more interested in just how leniently these monsters are treated even when caught and convicted:

A HEARING has taken place into whether a convicted paedophile from Pakistan should be allowed to stay in the UK.

Zulfar Hussain, 48, was jailed in August 2007, for abducting underage girls in Blackburn and Burnley and sexually exploiting them.

He was placed in an immigration removal centre earlier this year and was set to be deported.

However, he won an appeal which allowed him to remain and potentially return to Blackburn to live with his wife and children.

The Home Office appealed the decision and Hussain, formerly of Cowell Way, Blackburn, has remained locked up pending a final decision.

A spokesman for the UK Borders Agency confirmed his hearing had taken place on Wednesday and that a result was expected in two to three weeks.

Hussain and his co-accused, Qaiser Naveed, 34, formerly of Colne Road, Burnley, were convicted of child abduction, sexual activity with a child and supplying youngsters with heroin.

Naveed did not oppose his deportation and has returned to Pakistan after serving half his five-year, eight-month sentence.

Hussain’ successful appeal against deportation was based on his ‘right to a family life’ as he had lived in Blackburn with his family for 10 years.

That's correct - he still has "rights".

Despite the fact he was jailed for 5 years and 8 months in 2007 and has already been deemed to have served his time; despite what he did to British children in order to satisfy his own perverted lust.

As always, what about the rights of his victims? What about the rights of the decent British people he and his kind live off?

But of course, we count for even less to the people currently in charge of this country than we do to the likes of Hussain.

We'll carry on funding his appeals and the government's appeals, even as more predators slip in or carry on uncaught and nice people like David Cameron and Nick Clegg assure us that diversity is strength and anyone who feels otherwise is mentally ill.

I sometimes wonder if there's any hope for this country at all.

Horrible Histories

The following is a clip from a BBC history programme aimed at children.

It's riddled with factual inaccuracies, but the shrill, hectoring tone and the general anti-British content gives an interesting view of how the BBC views British history - and would like us to.

We actually fund this tripe.

A count of the lies and inaccuracies can be found in the comment section here.

Hat tip: Biased BBC.

The BBC Defines a "Fracas" in France

"MALI MAN DIES AFTER FRENCH POLICE USE TASER" screams the headline.

We have to wait two paragraphs to find out exactly why the taser was used:

Police said the 38-year-old man had attacked officers with a hammer at a Paris apartment block after being asked for identity papers.

He was also tear-gassed and struck with a baton, an official added.

Oh. Of course, the preceding paragraph is dedicated solely to nudging us in the direction of sympathy for the hammer-wielding thug:

An immigrant from Mali has died after French police shot him twice with a Taser electric stun gun during a fracas, officials say.

How carefully worded. He's identified as an immigrant because they want us to suspect racism might be involved - otherwise they'd go out of their way to avoid mentioning that fact.

Also, in what way is one man attacking police officers with a hammer a "fracas"? Fracas means "a noisy, disorderly fight or quarrel", doesn't it? It's a word that makes me think of two evenly matched sides being involved, in any case.

This sounds more like attempted murder. Not that I'm expecting any sort of honesty from the BBC, you understand, but it can't hurt to ask these questions.

Apparently, the incident will "reignite debate over the use of tasers" in France.

I've never fully understood this "controversy over the use of tasers" business; French police officers are armed with actual guns as standard, and I presume that if an individual attacks them with a potentially deadly weapon, for example with a hammer, and they feel their lives are in danger then they're entitled to shoot him, to kill if necessary.

Anyway, the main concern of human rights groups is that this poor dear was stunned twice; but to me, the actions of the police here are more than proportionate considering the circumstances:

The incident happened in the early hours of Tuesday when police were called to an argument at an apartment in the Paris suburb of Colombes involving the Malian, who was allegedly staying illegally in France.

When officers tried to check the man's identity papers he "flipped out" and grabbed a hammer, injuring four officers who chased him, a police source told the French news agency AFP.

I expect that certain French suburbs are already aflame over this. The Interior Minister, Brice Hortefeux, has issued a cautious statement which has not condemned the police outright - but is not as supportive as one might hope:

"From initial reports it seems that, faced with the aggression and violence of this person, police officers were obliged to use an electric charge pistol," Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux said.

Of course, he fails to mention that it's largely due to the wilful treason and gross negligence of his government that such people are in France to begin with, to take out their general aggression and violence on servants of the Republic whilst government ministers make promises they have no intention of keeping and look the other way.

Predictably, the human rights lobby are up in arms:

French human rights group Raidh called for an immediate ban on the guns pending the investigation.

It also demanded to know why the suspect had been shot twice.

Why? Well, let's keep it short: He attacked a group of police officers with a hammer and injured four of them.

What more is there to understand? He wasn't standing picking his nose when they swaggered down the street and stunned him.

What were they to do? Allow one of their colleagues to be killed or seriously injured in the name of strength through diversity or the injustices of French imperialism?

The debate I would like to see this incident "reignite" is the one about why such violent, primitive, unassimilable savages are in France to begin with, and why the allegedly "conservative" government of Sarkozy only ever wants to appease them rather than dealing with the issues they were elected to deal with.

Why are parts of many French towns and cities no-go areas for decent people? Why do the police and other emergency services have to face constant abuse, harassment and violence in the course of their duties? Why are the French treated like second class citizens in their own country whilst their government talks of them as an embarrassment and looks forward to their disappearance as "progress" - isn't any of that a debate worth having?

But of course, all we're going to get instead is hand-wringing and outpourings about "human rights" and "racism". I'm sure the police in question will end up being to blame for not just quietly letting him do whatever he wanted.

It all sounds depressingly familiar really, doesn't it?

Austrian Fined for "Disturbing" Muslim Prayers by Yodelling

The following story demonstrates just how far many European countries, even ones showing signs of life, have sunk in the quagmire of political correctness - and just what power minority groups and their alleged interests now wield over ordinary citizens.

An Austrian pensioner has been fined €800 for yodelling whilst mowing his grass in the town of Graz.

Unfortunately for the elderly Austrian chap, his activities happened to coincide with Friday prayers - his neighbours were trying to listen to the muezzin.

Naturally, instead of simply ignoring him or having a polite word, they called in the police - and the Austrian was dragged off to court.

The Muslim complainants, paranoid to the last, accused him of mocking them by trying to imitate their muezzin (as apparently yodelling sounds similar):

"The complaint boiled down to the fact that my yodeling resembled their muezzin. But it wasn't my intention at all to imitate him," the perplexed man told Australian newspaper Krone Zeitung Saturday.

There is so much wrong here it's hard to know where to start. The fine seems an incredibly hefty amount, even if one agrees with it ending up in court - which of course it should never have done. If my neighbour is whistling and mowing the grass whilst I'm listening to the radio in my garden, am I entitled to call the police? It's simply ludicrous.

The pattern fits; the Austrians have to change their lives and culture to suit the Muslims. What if the elderly man had decided he was disturbed by the muezzin?

Of course that would be a legitimate complaint for many reasons, but if it had been made it would have been dismissed out of hand at best or led to accusations of racism.

The Muslims of Austria are emboldened by such crawling; in August this year, the leader of Austria's Muslims had the following to say:

In an interview with the Austria Press Agency published Sunday, the head of the country's Islamic community, Anas Shakfeh, said he wished to see a mosque with a minaret in each of Austria's nine provincial capitals.

"That's my hope for the future," he said. "In the long term, one cannot prevent people from exercising their true religious freedom, which is protected by the constitution."

Presumably the streets of said cities will have to be cleared at certain times, lest the poor dears be offended by passing infidels as they prostrate themselves before Allah.

The question is, how long will Austrians prostrate themselves before Muslims? Given what's being done to Elsiabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, I'm guessing for a long time yet.

Afghan Murders 6 NATO Troops in "Misunderstanding"

From the BBC:

A gunman in an Afghan police uniform has killed six service members in eastern Afghanistan, Nato forces say.

The man opened fire during a training mission in Pachir Wagam district, Nangarhar province, said Nato. He was also killed in the incident.

Local officials said they believed the incident was not premeditated, but had arisen out of "a misunderstanding".

Nato has not revealed the nationalities of the dead soldiers, but local sources said they were American.

"An individual in an Afghan border police uniform turned his weapon against International Security Assistance Forces (Isaf) during a training mission today, killing six service members in eastern Afghanistan," Monday's statement said.

This is the country we're supposed to turn into a First World democracy - one where shooting 6 people dead is classed as a "misunderstanding".

Being brought coffee instead of tea is a misunderstanding; this is the cold-blooded, cowardly murder of men doing their duty.

Still, we shouldn't be too harsh - perhaps the killer misinterpreted the Koran? Apparently it does happen.

Couple Violently Attacked in London - Children Called "White Devils"

The Croydon Advertiser reports on a shockingly violent crime perpetrated against a young couple (above), in front of their children, in a South Norwood restaurant:

A MOTHER and father left a pub covered in blood after they were attacked in front of their two young children.

The mother was punched in the face and slashed with a broken bottle after an argument at The Harvester, in Beulah Hill, Upper Norwood.

When the father stepped in to protect her, he was smashed over the head with a bottle.

The couple also claim their children, aged just 6 and 9, were racially abused.

The family, whose identity we have agreed to protect, is asking for help to catch their assailants.

"I can't sleep at night because I feel like my children are at risk that these people might come back," said the mother.

"Someone must know who these people are, so I would just plead with them to go to the police with any information they have.

"I just want to know my family is safe."

The family, who are from the Coulsdon area, went into the Harvester pub Beulah Spa at about 6.15pm on November 13.

They had just sat down when a group of five people came in.

The mother said a woman started the confrontation by suggesting she was looking at her.

When the father tried to defuse the situation, the others in the group began hurling racist abuse, even calling the couple's six-year-old a "white devil".

"It all happened really fast," the mother said. We stood up to leave and the woman punched me in the face.

"We were struggling and someone else smashed this bottle over my head from behind, the pain was blinding."

The mother suffered two black eyes and a cut to her head, while the father was treated at Croydon University Hospital for a gash to the back of his head. He has since returned to work, but has suffered concussion, while his partner has been having panic and anxiety attacks.

"I am scared all the time and I can't think of anything else," she added.

"It was one of the worst nights of my life and I just want to put it behind me."

A police spokesman said officers are investigating the attack, but no arrests have been made.

A spokesman for Mitchell and Butlers, which owns Harvester, said: "This was an isolated yet extremely serious incident which occurred between two groups of customers.

"Our staff called the police immediately to deal with the situation, and will do everything they can to assist with any subsequent police investigation."

Anyone with information can contact Croydon Police on 0300 123 1212 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Hmm.

Not one mention of this on the BBC, or in any of the national dailies.

Also, isn't it rather hard for the public to come forward with any information if they don't know what the assailants look like?

Might be a bit of a sensitive subject, I realise, but still.

Can you imagine the outcry if the reverse had happened? Five skin heads, broken bottles, "Black Devil"?

I think cases like this amply demonstrate that the dreaded sin of racism is alive and well in Britain - and those who denounce it the loudest are the most guilty of perpetuating it.

After all, these people don't matter, they're not part of some special interest group - it's not as if society can learn any valuable lessons from this crime, is it?

Actually, perhaps it can - and perhaps that's why the media do their best to avoid stories like this where possible.

Mass Immigration Provides Opportunities

I was discussing politics with a friend a couple of weeks back; the subject of immigration came up, and my friend urged me to think about the opportunities it provides us with.

"Even mass immigration from the Third World?" I asked rather naively.

Of course, was the emphatic response. Think about how much better formerly homogenous countries are now they're colourful and diverse!

Well, over the past couple of years I like to think I've done my bit to chronicle the many diverse opportunities Western countries and peoples have been on the receiving end of; they just keep on coming, however, and we had two more notable cases come to light very recently.

Firstly, in the United States, 19 year old Somali Mohamed Osman Mohamud was detained for plotting to bomb a Christmas tree lighting event in Oregon, hoping to kill as many people as possible.

Mohamud, who the BBC naturally describe as a "US teenager", had apparently been dreaming of carrying out Jihad since the age of 15:

Mr Mohamud, who lives in the town of Corvallis, had driven a van to the ceremony and was arrested at around 1740 local time on Friday (0040 GMT Saturday), about 20 minutes before the tree lighting was to occur.

Prosecutors said Mr Mohamud had shouted "Allahu Akbar!" (God is great!) and tried to kick agents as they closed in.

Court documents said the case began in August 2009 with e-mail exchanges between Mr Mohamud and his alleged associate in Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province.

Special FBI agent Arthur Balizan said: "The threat was very real. Our investigation shows that Mohamud was absolutely committed to carrying out an attack on a very grand scale. I want to reassure the people of this community that, at every turn, we denied him the ability to actually carry out the attack."

The Oregonian newspaper quoted Oregon US Attorney Dwight Holton as saying: "This defendant's chilling determination is a stark reminder that there are people - even here in Oregon - who are determined to kill Americans."

He said there was "no reason to believe there is any continuing threat arising from this case".

An undercover agent had posed as an associate of the Pakistan contact and met Mr Mohamud to discuss the plan, the court papers said.

The agent informed Mr Mohamud there would be "a lot of children" at the ceremony but Mr Mohamud allegedly said he was looking for a "huge mass that will be attacked in their own element with their families celebrating the holidays".

Mr Mohamud allegedly told the FBI agent that he had been thinking of carrying out a jihad, or holy war, against infidels since the age of 15.

Somalia's loss was clearly America's gain - think how boring Oregon must have been before fanatical barbarians who dream of slaughtering those they live off were imported. It doesn't bear thinking about.

There will be plenty of people wondering how this could have happened - and the answer "America imported lots of aggressive, unassimilable Muslim aliens from some of the most hostile places on the planet" will never even occur to them.

Lawrence Auster reports that around 99.6 of media reports did not mention the words "Muslim", "Islam" or "Islamic".

Frankly, I'm a little impressed the BBC left in the mention of "Jihad". Their sideline rather grimly informs us that the US is facing an "increasing home grown terror threat" without ever quite alluding to why - although they are probably more inclined to blame the English Defence League rather than suicidal immigration policies.

But still, let's be thankful that the FBI had the opportunity to take down Mohamud before he had the opportunity to give innocent Americans the ultimate payback for their generosity towards him.

Britain is in the same boat, of course. On Thursday, The Guardian reported that some Afghans are spending part of the year working in Britain before spending their holidays fighting NATO troops back home:

British-based men of Afghan origin are spending months at a time in Afghanistan fighting Nato forces before returning to the UK, the Guardian has learned. They also send money to the Taliban.

A Taliban fighter in Dhani-Ghorri in northern Afghanistan last month told the Guardian he lived most of the time in east London, but came to Afghanistan for three months of the year for combat.

"I work as a minicab driver," said the man, who has the rank of a mid-level Taliban commander. "I make good money there [in the UK], you know. But these people are my friends and my family and it's my duty to come to fight the jihad with them."

"There are many people like me in London," he added. "We collect money for the jihad all year and come and fight if we can."

His older brother, a senior cleric or mawlawi who also fought in Dhani-Ghorri, lives in London as well.

Well of course he does - it's a great opportunity, I'm sure, claiming benefits illegally from the infidel before spending a relaxing few weeks trying to spill his blood.

It's about time the West woke up to just who is benefitting from all these opportunities, and who has the most to lose.

The United Kingdom of Dhimmitude

On Saturday the Leicester Mercury reported that Lee Whitby, an English Defence League supporter, was fined £200 by a British magistrate after being found guilty of "using racially aggravated abusive words" at a recent demonstration.

What were these terrible words? Well, we don't actually find out for sure, but the newspaper article is very clear that the man's offence was insulting Allah:

A man has been fined for making offensive comments about Allah during the English Defence League protest in Leicester.

Lee Whitby was found guilty of using racially aggravated abusive words during the protest in the city centre on Saturday, October 9.

During a trial at Leicester Magistrates' Court yesterday, the 27-year-old pleaded not guilty to chanting "threatening, abusive or insulting" words that were likely to cause "harassment, alarm or distress."

Although he admitted making comments, Whitby said he did not believe they would have been heard by anyone other than police officers or fellow EDL supporters.

However, magistrate Rick Moore ruled that officers were likely to have been alarmed by the defendant's words.

Alexandra Blossom, prosecuting, said the comments made were bound to cause harassment, alarm or distress because of Leicester's multicultural society and the fact the words were said in the city centre.

She said: "A number of people present that day were likely to be offended.

"It was a high-profile event and members of the public would have been in the city on a Saturday.

"The remarks are even offensive to police.

"A clear message needs to be sent out about using such behaviour in a multicultural city."

The court heard Whitby had two previous convictions for common assault.

Mr Moore said: "It is a fact you were with others chanting and police were within hearing distance but there is no evidence of non-police officers within hearing distance.

"It is likely that a police officer or officers hearing the words would be likely to be alarmed and for that reason we find you guilty of this offence."

Whitby was fined £200 and ordered to pay a further £200 in costs, as well as a £15 victim surcharge.

Complete and utter madness.

Firstly, in what way is insulting (can you insult something that's not sentient?) a deity one does not believe in a "racially motivated" offence? This is a free country, and people have the right to choose whether or not they bow down before some stone age moon god, or mock those who do.

Secondly, in what way are British police officers likely to be offended or distressed by hearing a chant about Allah?

What if they are? I'd imagine many of the police officers who had to guard the protest by Muslims on Rembrance Day, during which poppies were burned and the traditional two minutes' silence was disrupted by Muslims shouting "British soldiers burn in hell" were quite offended by that behaviour; however, they remained resolute and professional and did what they were told to do.

This is something of a moral minefield, because the CPS and the magistrate seem to be assuming that all right thinking people are disgusted by "offensive" comments about Allah - but does that notion then stretch to other religions? Could Richard Dawkins be prosecuted for making "offensive" remarks about God and Christianity?

However, prostrating themselves before Islam whilst allegedly attempting to defend our multicultural society (the one they created against the will of the majority via stealth, deception, social engineering and outright lies, you'll remember) seems to be coming increasingly common.

Two weeks ago, West Midlands Police (they have quite a lot of form for this kind of thing) arrested a 15 year old girl for burning an English-language copy of the Koran and posting footage of the act on YouTube.

As others have noted, I wasn't aware that burning your own property was a crime in the United Kingdom - but when it comes to things that might offend the followers of the Religion of Peace, all bets are off.

Apparently, teachers have made sure the girl knows what she did is wrong:

It is understood the girl, who lives in the Sandwell Council area, was filmed setting the English language Koran alight while other pupils watched.

"I think this young lady did not realise exactly what she was doing. In fact I know she didn't," said the teacher, who cannot be named.

"Because if she stopped to consider the fallout of doing this kind of thing, and she considered the offence it would cause to people within her own community in the school, I honestly don't believe she would have done it.

"And I also know for a fact that she deeply regrets what she has done."

We also get the standard claptrap - multiculturalism, this has made us stronger, etc etc. The teacher comes frighteningly close to acknowledging reality, however:

"We informed police of the incident, clearly, because of the seriousness of it," said the teacher.

"I'm very concerned over the wider impact of this in terms of people with extreme views may choose to jump on a bandwagon.

"That is my deep-seated fear at this moment in time."

Wider impact? Whatever could he mean?

Surely not... violence? From members of the Religion of Peace? I'm suprised he wasn't arrested for incitement to racial hatred himself for such an outrageous remark!

This is our multicultural paradise, though - arrested for "insulting" an Arab deity and burning an English translation of the 9th Century ramblings of a warlord, slave trader and paedophile.

Let's not forget, also, the possibility of being arrested for speaking out about these issues - or the implicit threat of violence, always present, that helps these people get exactly what they want, whenever they want it, whilst our own values and standards are ignored.

Funny that someone could be so close to the truth as the anonymous West Midlands teacher, and yet still so far away from reality.

Perhaps someone in authority could honestly inform us about the "wider impact" of enforcing Sharia law (for that is what suppressing all criticism of Islam, Allah and safeguarding all physical copies of the Koran amounts to) - or would that be too much to ask?

Muslim Cuts Out Australian Girlfriend's Tongue (II)

An update on this story from Gold Coast News:

A SOUTH Australian man charged with cutting off his ex-girlfriend's tongue has been adamantly refused bail by a Gold Coast magistrate today.

"In anyone's terms these allegations are horrifying and brutal," said Magistrate Catherine Pirie.

"I've been on the bench for more than 10 years and I don't think I've seen anything like this."

Mohammed Tasleem Tahir, 21, stands charged with torture, grievous bodily harm and acts intended to maim after police found him covered in blood at his ex-girlfriend's Surfers Paradise apartment on November 13.

They found 20-year-old Catherine Cameron lying on her bed with a fractured eye socket, her tongue cut off and deep cuts to both sides of her mouth.

A bloodied knife and empty rum bottle lay on the floor nearby.

Yesterday he appeared in the Southport Magistrates Court via videolink from Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre to apply for bail.

Police prosecutor Sergeant Brian Cazzulino said an emergency ward doctor had described the young woman's horrific injuries as `the worst she had seen in five years'.

Police alleged Mr Tahir, of Fijian descent, had a volatile relationship with Ms Cameron in South Australia where he had been accused of stalking her, threatening her family and throwing beer bottles at her while she sat in her car.

Sgt Cazzulino said Ms Cameron fled to the Gold Coast, legally changed her name and switched phone numbers three times to hide from Mr Tahir but he continued to track her down in a bid to restore their relationship.

The court was told Ms Cameron came home to find Mr Tahir in her living room and endured a brutal assault which only ended when she went limp and pretended to be unconscious.

She told police Mr Tahir left the room and she recalled hearing him on the phone telling someone that 'he had just killed someone' and asking them to look after his family.

Sgt Cazzulino said while Mr Tahir had been in custody he had not shown remorse.

"He refuses to believe he has committed an offence," he said.

Barrister Bernard Battley sought bail for Mr Tahir on the grounds he was the full-time carer of his elderly father who suffered from chronic pain.

Mr Battley said he client would consent to reporting to police each day if granted bail.

But Sgt Cazzulino strongly objected as Mr Tahir was known to have family in Fiji and police feared he would leave the country on bail and not return.

Ms Pirie said Mr Tahir had not shown cause and granting bail would be inappropriate.

He was remanded in custody and will return to court on December 23.

Can any Australian readers confirm if this case has been covered by the national media yet?

Death of PC Jon Henry "Could Have Been Prevented"

Back in March 2009 I reported on the events surrounding the death of PC Jon Henry, stabbed to death in 2007 by Ikechukwu Tennyson Obih, a Nigerian "asylum seeker" with indefinate leave to remain in the United Kingdom.

PC Henry was attempting to protect members of the public and fellow officers when he died; Obih (below), a paranoid schizophrenic, went on the rampage in Luton town centre after having a dream in which he could kill a man just by touching him.

Obih's condition was apparently exacerbated by alcohol abuse and cannabis use; he was so terrified of the country he had fled and sought asylum from that in 2006 he returned to Nigeria to visit his father.

This medical expert advised him to stop taking the medication so generously provided by the British taxpayer and use olive oil to control his symptoms instead.

The deterioration of his condition which followed led directly to the events which saw PC Henry murdered.

You'll be delighted to learn, however (and I'm sure the widow and young daughter PC Henry left behind will, too) that this situation could have been prevented.

How? Well, the BBC tells us:

The death of a police officer killed by a man with paranoid schizophrenia could have been prevented if he had been treated suitably, a report found.

NHS East of England commissioned the investigation into the care of Ikechukwu Tennyson Obih, who stabbed Bedfordshire Pc Jon Henry in 2007.

The report said the closure of an early intervention service that Obih had used was the starting point of the case.

Ah, that'll be it then.

I have an alternative range of scenarios, which of course will never even be alluded to on the BBC:

How about parasites like Obih are never allowed into this country in the first place?

How about their "asylum" applications are actually glanced at, and if they pop home to the country they're allegedly fleeing from, they're immediately arrested, charged with making a fraudulent application, deported and banned from ever entering the United Kingdom again?

How about when those who come here choose to live off of us, expecting us to pay for their alcohol and cannabis habits as well as treat their schizophrenia, they are immediately deported and banned from the United Kingdom?

How about we're allowed to (gasp) discriminate, and recognise that immigrants from certain groups tend to fit in, and others don't - after all, who's doing who the favour here?

I think you get the idea with that; it's just a shame that no one in the media or our government can let the actual, legitimate interests of the British people, people like PC Henry and his family and the others who were hurt by Obih, penetrate their ideological blinkers even just for a second.

Turkish Student Charged with Grooming in Australia

"Coast student charged with grooming" is the article headline in yesterday's Goldcoast local newspaper.

It's only by clicking that headline that we discover the following information:

A TURKISH university student will face a committal hearing on the Gold Coast next year for allegedly using the Internet to groom a 14-year-old child.

Yilmaz Dede, 23, of Surfers Paradise, is facing a Commonwealth charges of using a carriage service to procure and groom a person under 16.

He was arrested in July this year at the Nerang Railway Station by State detectives from Taskforce Argos.

His case was set down for a hearing in the Southport Magistrates Court from May 19.

Today Mr Dede's solicitor Matthew Gibson said he expected to make a application in the near future to have his client's confiscated laptop returned to him but a Commonwealth prosecutor said the future application would be opposed.

Ah, so the perpetrator isn't so much a "Coast student" as a Turkish student.

Obviously, the main concern is that the poor chap has had his laptop confiscated by the authorities; they'd best return it forthwith, how else will he target infidel children and women whilst he lives it up on the Australian taxpayer?

I mean, that's got to be a breach of his human rights or something, surely?

In any sane place he'd either be in prison or on the first plane back, not languishing on bail so he can continue to prey on the naive and the vulnerable.

Muslim Cuts Out Australian Girlfriend's Tongue

Yet another unfortunate example of a naive Western woman paying a high price for her involvement with a Muslim man:

A CHARGE of torture has been laid against a South Australian man who allegedly cut off a woman's tongue with a knife and sliced each side of her mouth open.

Mohammed Tasleem Tahir, 21, today faced the Southport Magistrates Court charged with torture, acts intended to maim and disfigure and grievous bodily harm over the weekend attack in Surfers Paradise.

Police will allege 20-year-old Catherine Cameron was rushed to hospital in the early hours of Saturday morning with a 4cm slash to the right side of her mouth and a 2cm slash to the left which exposed her mouth cavity.

She also allegedly had her tongue cut in half and her fractured eye socket will require a metal plate to be inserted.

Court documents allege the woman had come to the Gold Coast six months ago, leaving behind her defacto partner, Mr Tahir, in South Australia.

She told police she changed her name and phone number to start afresh but was allegedly confronted by Mr Tahir at her Surfers Paradise unit around 1.30am who wanted to 'repair' the relationship.

The documents allege Mr Tahir held her in a head lock and bashed her repeatedly with an empty Bundaberg Rum bottle before pulling out a knife.

He allegedly held it to her throat before placing it in her mouth and cutting her lips and tongue.

Police will allege he then took her into the bedroom and attempted to strangle her on her bed, only stopping when she went limp and pretended to be unconscious.

Worried neighbours called triple-zero after hearing sounds of a violent struggle and police allegedly found Mr Tahir in the apartment living room and located a bloodied rum bottle.

Barrister Bernard Battley sought an adjournment for his client for a bail application on November 26.

Mr Tahir will face court that day via videolink from prison.

As Lawrence Auster has previously observed, this sort of violence resulting from a mixed relationship is becoming a classic pattern in most Western countries - and yet, no one in the media or in authority will ever acknowledge it.

They are selling out their populations in order to enact one of the most damaging and insane social experiments in known human history - and we not only let them, we enable them.

Israeli Student Attacked at Italian University

An Israeli architecture student was eating his lunch at the university he attends in Genoa, Italy, last week when a student from Gaza came up, punched him, and began shouting abuse.

The following events played out:

Assaf, a 26-year-old Israeli architecture student, was eating at the cafeteria when Ibrahim Haji, a student from Gaza, came and began taunting him. "He came towards me, punched me and said 'why are you looking at me?' I told him I wasn't looking at him, and asked him to let me eat in peace," Assaf said. "A minute later he was back, swinging a fork, and called me in front of everyone to come outside while cursing Israel and declaring his intention to kill.

I understood that I have to avoid this dangerous situation. I told my Italian friends, who were eating with me, that I'm going back to my room so as not to respond to this provocation. On my way out I turned to the cashier and told her, 'Call the police. You heard the man threatening to kill,' and she responded, 'It's not my job to separate Jews and Arabs.'

Quite. It wasn't a member of a favoured victim group being attacked, therefore it's simply not important. Welcome to the European Union...

It gets worse, however:

Assaf's attempt to distance himself from the fight failed. Ibrahim waited for him outside and went for the attack. As Assaf tried to defend himself, Italian passersby stepped in to intervene and held him back. Ibrahim took the opportunity to draw a large kitchen knife. The Italian students tried to stop him.

"I saw death in front of my eyes. I broke free and ran into the storage in the kitchen and locked myself in. After a few minutes more Muslim students arrived and began shouting 'Allahu Akbar' (God is great) and 'Itbach el Yahud' (slaughter the Jews). Later I understood that there are over 40 angry students there.

The Italians disappeared; they were scared to deal with them. I managed to get myself into the trash facility. I climbed a three-meter wall and jumped. I told myself it's better to break a leg than to get killed."

Assaf said that he went to the police but was ignored, until he turned to the community rabbi and additional Jewish families for assistance. "We filed an official complaint with the police, and they even informed the local investigation agency," said Chaim Amar, a 28-year-old medical student who serves as a security officer at the local synagogue. "Unfortunately, nothing came of it so far."

According to Amar, the police are familiar with Haji from previous violent incidents. It wasn't his first time threatening the life of an Israeli student, and he reportedly harasses female Israeli students regularly. "It's a matter of time before his next violent outburst," Amar said.

It doesn't even stop there; Assaf found himsef in the position of being blamed and resented by some fellow students and even university staff; the housekeeper at his dorm chastised him for contacting the police as it could ruin the Arab student's life.

What is he supposed to do upon being threatened with a knife, having his country cursed and being surrounded by a threatening crowd singing about how they wish to slaughter his people? Feel particularly vibrant, enriched and lucky to be able to celebrate such exciting diversity up close?

What are these violent Arab "students" even doing in Italy (apart from absorbing large sums of taxpayers' cash, no doubt)? It's quite clear these individuals are thugs, if not from this incident then from reports of their previous conduct and the fact all the Italian students (bar one) are too afraid to back Assaf.

All European countries need to stop importing violent, unassimilable immigrants now - for all our sakes.

Obviously if this incident had seen the Jewish and Arab elements reversed, it would be all over the BBC - but then it would never have played out like that, and we need to wake up to reality and start being honest with ourselves; some cultures, some immigrants just don't work.

But, clearly it couldn't be reported as it happened, because it might wake some more people up to the sheer, irrational, latent hostility which Israel and Israelis face everyday from those poor oppressed mites who build rockets with our "aid" whilst laughing at us, just for having the audacity to exist.

To paraphrase an old saying, you just can't be nice to some people - particularly those who see you as subhuman because you're an infidel and want you dead.

Europe needs to recognise who it's real friends - and enemies - are.

Hat tip: Islam in Europe.

Convicted Asian Paedophile Praised by Labour & Lib Dem MPs

The Yorkshire Post reports the imprisonment of businessman Gulam Bobat for 12 months, convicted of plying girls aged as young as 13 with alcohol, cannabis and cash so he could kiss them on the head and grope them through their clothes in his car.

This went on for three years in Leeds, with Bobat targetting countless local schoolgirls; indeed the size of the "incentives" he was offering reached the point where a couple of the more mercenary girls even began to target him, flagging down his car when it was spotted in the street.

Despite this, two local MPs, Greg Mulholland and Mike Wood, sent character references to the judge on Bobat's behalf, describing him as "honest and industrious".

When your young daughter is safely at private school or somewhere nice and he's not targetting her, perhaps that's how he comes across - particularly if you've already sold all of your principles.

Seeing as Bobat could afford to pay one of his young victims thousands of pounds to endure his attentions, would it be impertinent of me to ask some questions about campaign funding or donations to the local Labour Party?

Here is the full story:

A LONELY businessman plied schoolgirls with money, alcohol, cannabis, and cigarettes so he could kiss and touch them, a court heard.

Gulam Bobat handed over thousands of pounds to one girl to encourage her to get into his car with him and word spread among her adolescent friends and others what he was offering.

Over a three-year period, he picked girls aged 13 to 15 because he misguidedly enjoyed their company not because he was a serious sexual predator, Ken Green representing him told Leeds Crown Court yesterday.

Bobat, 64 of Princess Street, Batley, was jailed for 12 months after he admitted six charges of sexual assault and one of inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.

He was also ordered to register as a sex offender for 10 years and barred from working with children.

Sentencing him, the Recorder of Leeds, Judge Peter Collier QC told Bobat: "You took advantage of their vulnerability and lack of maturity."

Word spread among them if they went for a ride in his car he would give them money, cigarettes, alcohol and even cannabis in exchange for being kissed on the head or touched over their clothes.

But the judge had read a number of references including from local MPs Greg Mulholland and Mike Wood who spoke well of him as an honest and industrious man.

"From one point of view it is a very sad case. The sexual gratification you obtained from this must have been very small, on the other hand the harm you have done to these girls is very difficult to tell at this stage and the harm is perhaps more in what you offered them, in that respect your culpability is very great."

Nicholas Askins, prosecuting, said the first complainant was befriended by Bobat in 2005 and met with him a dozen times during which she said he gave her thousands of pounds as well as cigarettes and cannabis. He had kissed her on the top of her head.

By 2007 his reputation had spread and girls would flag his car down knowing what was on offer.

One girl aged 13 said she felt dirty after he kissed her on the forehead after giving her and three of her friends a lift in his van.

When arrested in 2008 he had £835 cash on him and seven mobile phone Sim cards.

Mr Green said for a long time Bobat, a grandfather, had been in denial about his behaviour and had not even felt able to tell his wife.

Mr Green said it was more a case of a lonely man without friends in a non-affectionate marriage.

"He had the opportunity over this period of time to satisfy his wants if he was a serious sexual predator but the offences did not escalate."

I might be being too sensitive here, but I have some concerns about the way the story is written.

Is it just me, or is Bobat almost portrayed sympathetically, as some kind of victim? I get the distinct impression I am supposed to feel sorry for him on some level.

White men who behave in this way are generally dismissed by the media as loners, creeps, weirdos; a fair assertion, perhaps, but miles away from how this incident is reported (although we only have this local paper to go on; astonishingly, the BBC and the nationals don't seem to feel any useful lessons can be learned from this case).

Needless to say, I don't feel sorry for him; he abused the hospitality of this country, which allowed him to build a life and become successful, by preying on and abusing British children.

Of course, it would be too much to expect the article to highlight that. What it does seem to highlight is just how the collapse of moral standards and the promotion of coarse, shameless behaviour as "cool" or no big deal has affected many young people in Britain, with girls especially vulnerable to the consequences.

That, however, is no excuse for what he did. There seem to be many cases like this, where foreign (and particularly Muslim) men see British women and children as a resource, something to be used up and tossed aside when it is no longer useful; of course, Islamic culture sees all women and infidels in that way, not that the media will ever dare join the dots.

The child abuse Bobat was responsible for was in no way benign, as his defence and even the judge try to make out; the tragic case of Charlene Downes several years ago highlights just what can happen when young white girls who are naive and lack self-respect meet predatory "Asian" men.

The BBC described 14 year old Charlene as the "lover" of the imported monster who sexually abused her and very probably killed her and chopped her up for kebab meat, once again downplaying the true seriousness of the situation.

When will British people say enough is enough and stand up for themselves?

RAF Man Refused Taxi by Aggressive "Asian" Driver

Ironically this story was published in the Yorkshire Post on Remembrance Day, but I suppose seeing as there are now vast numbers of people in Yorkshire and elsewhere who either don't know what that is or are actively hostile to it, that's not overly important.

Here's the full story:

AN inquiry is underway after an RAF serviceman was refused a cab by an Asian taxi driver in Sheffield who objected to his uniform.

The 24-year-old serviceman who had been at a family wedding ceremony in his RAF "blues" was turned away from the black cab by the driver who apparently became aggressive.

Sheffield City Council, the RAF and the local taxi association are now investigating amid calls for the driver to be sacked.
....

The incident happened last Saturday after Kevin Burke's daughter got married at Sheffield Register Office.

Mr Burke, 46, a part-time lecturer from Sheffield, did not want to reveal his son's name who is from the city but is based in Scotland, for security reasons.

But he said he wants the authorities to take action.

He said: "My wife and my son went to get a taxi near the town hall after the ceremony to go on to the reception.

"When the cab pulled up they were about to get in when the driver said he wasn't letting my son in because he was in uniform.

"My wife asked him for a reason and the driver became quite aggressive in turning them down. He made it quite clear it was because my son was in the forces.

"Being a professional my son just turned his back and walked away and they hailed a private taxi to get to the reception.

"It is totally disgusting. The driver did not give an opinion but made it apparent he did not like servicemen.

"If you are providing a public service you should not refuse people like my son. He is fighting for his country after all."

Even the local taxi drivers are incensed at what happened.

A spokesman for the local black cab drivers said: "It is not needed. These servicemen and women protect our way of life. They put their lives at risk for this nation. To be treated like that is unbelievable."

Sheffield City Council said: "On the face of it is disappointing and disheartening."

What I find "disappointing and disheartening" is the typical disconnect between the reaction to this story and actual reality.

The government has encouraged vast numbers of people who can't assimilate to settle in this country, many of whom will actually actively despise it for good measure.

Local authoritues such as Sheffield City Council have exacerbated the situation with official policies about "multiculturalism" and "celebrating diversity" which further encourages such immigrants to not even bother trying to fit in.

Couple this with a knee-jerk hatred of their own history and culture instilled in many British people, plus fairly severe sanctions against anyone who dares to speak out in favour of common sense, and this is the result.

Why is anyone surprised?

More importantly, why are British soldiers fighting and dying in Afghanistan when they face this from Muslims in their own country?

Shouldn't the enemy within, the enemy we're enabling in every way we can, be our primary concern?

"Asian" Attacks Student in Luton

Another late night sex crime committed by a mysterious "Asian" chap, as Luton Today reports:

A 22-YEAR-OLD student was attacked last week after she left a Luton nightclub in the early hours of the morning.

The victim left Liquid nightclub, Gordon Street, Luton, just before 1am on November 2 and walked to the top of Market Hill, where she was pushed to the ground and grabbed by a man.

But the victim managed to break away from her attacker before he walked away towards the Crown Court building.

Det Con Amy Kelly is keen to speak to anyone who can identify the man responsible, who is described as of Asian appearance, around 6ft tall, with dark short hair and a medium build.

He was wearing dark jeans and a top with wide stripes on it.

Det Con Kelly said: “It is possible that this man followed the victim from the nightclub before assaulting her and I would ask anyone who was in the area at the time or anyone who saw someone matching this description loitering outside the club to speak to the police.”

The officer also warned partygoers to be careful on a night out: “I would also like to take this opportunity to remind anyone who is out and about late at night to ensure they stay with friends, use a licensed taxi to get home and always tell friends or family where you are going and when to expect you home.”

Anyone with information on this incident can call Det Con Kelly at Luton CID on 01582 394333 or text 07786 200011. Alternatively, contact Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.

Indeed, partygoers certainly should be careful late at night - particularly in areas with a high percentage of imported foreign criminals who have utter contempt and a predatory regard for the host population, their females especially.

I've said it because Detective Constable Kelly can't.

11th November

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie,
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

Today we pay tribute to all those who have fallen in defence of our country - and continue to follow their orders and do their duty, no matter how obscure or futile the cause.

God Bless them all.

Tube Sex Pest Jailed

It's those damned jobs that British people just won't do again:

An Olympic site worker who rubbed himself against two women on packed Tube trains has been jailed for 18 months.

Tony Uwaifo, 40, was also banned from taking rush-hour Tube trains for eight years.

Uwaifo, of Leyton, was convicted of two counts of sex assault on the Central line between Stratford and Liverpool Street. He was cleared of two similar charges at Blackfriars crown court.

Both victims handed clothes and possessions to the police and DNA tests pointed conclusively to Uwaifo.

He claimed he was a victim of a medical condition causing “intemperate ejaculation”. Uwaifo told police he always took his tea break from the Stratford Olympic site to coincide with the morning rush hour.

Enriching the NHS

How immigrants supposedly benefit the NHS is one of the favourite arguments used by those who favour mass immigration; of course, we could talk about the dearth of unnecessary roles provided by that organisation, or the way the population has swelled as a result of mass immigration, thus meaning more pressure on the NHS and creating a vicious circle - but as they say, a picture paints a thousand words.

From the BBC:

A former nurse at John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, has been found guilty of raping a teenage patient and indecently assaulting another woman.

Oliver Balicao, of Lerwick Court, Bicester, was a senior nurse when the offences took place in 2002 and 2004.

The 37-year-old indecently assaulted a 22-year-old woman in 2002 and raped a 17-year-old girl in 2004.

He was found guilty at Reading Crown Court and warned he faced a "substantial" sentence.

The youngest of Balicao's victims said she was raped in a side room at the hospital's accident and emergency department in October 2004.

At the time her boyfriend and mother didn't believe her because she had been admitted following a drug overdose and had been hallucinating.

But in 2007 the victim went to the police after seeing Balicao's photograph in the news after he admitted having consensual sex with another teenage patient in a disabled toilet.

Balicao's other victim told police he had forcibly kissed her when she was a patient in 2002.

Earlier judge Stephen John told Reading Crown Court that Balicao had committed a "grave breach of trust" and warned him "to expect a substantial sentence".

Indeed.

Yet another Third World parasite who sees the British people, who paid for his employment in a position of trust and responsibility, as playthings, as prey.

But I probably shouldn't be too harsh - perhaps he was raping the patients that British nurses just wouldn't rape.

Diversity & Islamic Cultural Enrichment in Scotland

In July 2009 I reported on the desire of Jim Murphy, the then-Scottish Secretary, for Scotland to become what he called a "melting pot".

Such was his desire for the vibrant, colourful customs and behaviour which can be found in any cursory search here at The Lambeth Walk that he even offered potential violent, primitive Third World chancers immigrants who chose to settle in Scotland a fast-track to British citizenship - so they could legally enrich us all.

I know what you're all thinking - what a caring, absolutely wonderful man that Jim Murphy must be - and how in touch with reality he is! May Allah take pity on his infidel soul.

Well, I have to admit that Jim's vision is starting to achieve results. Back in March, I reported that there were plans to open an Islamic cultural centre near to the site where Kriss Donald, a Scottish teenager, was brutally and callously murdered by a gang of Pakistani men simply for being white.

As if that wasn't enough of an insult to the Scottish people, two months before in January the killers of Kriss demanded compensation from the Scottish Prison Service - because it locked them in solitary confinement for their own protection:

THE jailed thugs who killed Kriss Donald are claiming damages for being locked in solitary confinement, we can reveal today.

Murderers Imran 'Baldy' Shahid, Zeeshan 'Crazy' Shahid and Mohammed 'Becks' Mushtaq were only put in solitary to protect them from other cons revolted by their racist crime.

But the whining murderers claim that being cooped up on their own has caused them mental damage.

And they are demanding thousands of pounds each from the public purse in compensation for the so-called breach of their human rights.

Becks's claim, the first of the three, is due to come to court on Friday.

All three killers have demanded Legal Aid to fight their cases and officials have yet to decide on their applications. ....

Baldy was jailed for a minimum of 25 years, Crazy for 23 years and Becks for 22. Baldy, 33, is in Shotts jail and has been in solitary since starting his sentence.

He claims being held alone has had a "detrimental effect on his physical and mental health".

His damages case will be heard on February 3. It's the latest in a long series of complaints by the thug about his conviction and sentence.

He claims he should be freed because there were no Asians on the jury that condemned him and his appeal is due to be heard this year.

Baldy has moaned before about being in solitary and has accused prison chiefs of leaving him in "spiritual isolation".

No Asians on the jury? Well, that's a clear miscarriage of justice then. Of course I'm joking, but in modern Britain there is no need for satire - back in 2008, "Baldy" tried to get his conviction quashed on that very basis - at our expense.

The presiding judge showed a sense of humour though:

At the Court of Criminal Appeal yesterday, lawyers argued that the killer had not been judged by a jury of his peers.

But Lord Nimmo Smith, who heard the application along with Lord Wheatley and Lord Abernethy, ruled: "His peers are fellow citizens of the United Kingdom."

As for spiritual isolation, I find it very hard to believe that any one who participated in what these animals did to Kriss could actually have a soul.

Anyway, Baldy continues to waste taxpayers money and spit in the face of Kriss's family whatever chance he gets - at his hearing over the solitary confinement case, he fired his lawyers at the last minute, meaning the hearing could not take place.

Ah well, I'm sure we'll buy him some better ones.

Anyone reading this can surely only be struck by the degree to which Scotland has improved with the presence of these fine, upstanding gentlemen.

But Jim Murphy's beautiful vision is not dead - things north of the border just keep getting better and better!

In August, a Pakistani thug was arrested for beating up his Scottish girlfriend in Aberdeen.

Naturally, mere infidels interfering in his business annoyed him, and he went on a bit of a tirade against the police, calling them "ginger, haggis-munching Scottish bastards" and telling them he would gladly blow them and any passersby up if he had the chance:

Pakistani Mohammed Amir launched the foul tirade - and threatened to blow 20 people up - as he was nicked for battering his girlfriend.

The 29-year-old lout told police officers he'd "gladly" wipe them out with passers-by during the arrest in an Aberdeen city centre street.

Yesterday, the city's sheriff court heard how Amir said: "I'm going to kill 20 of you and blow you to bits. F*** you, you haggis-munching ginger b******s. I'm going to bomb you white f*****s."

Remorseless Amir - who made rude gestures as he was led away to start an 18-month jail term - was convicted of a string of crimes.

He admitted punching Cindy Gordon in the street in February and racially abusing cops.

The yob pleaded guilty to threatening to stab a cabbie who had tried to stop him attacking Ms Gordon again just a month later. He also admitted theft and breaking bail conditions. Amir (below) was described as having problems with heroin use and anger-management.

Indeed. A shining example of Jim Murphy's vision, I would have thought. The Scottish government seem happy:

Last night Labour justice spokesman Richard Baker MSP said the public would be "relieved" the brute was behind bars.

He said: "This man deserved a custodial sentence and it's important that all racist offences are treated in that way by the courts."

A Scottish Government spokesman added: "There is no place for racism in Scotland. It is unacceptable and will not be tolerated."

I'm going to go out on a limb here; I bet that there are many Scottish people reading this who are wondering who has the bigger problem.

Is it Amir with his "anger management" issues, or the Scottish government with their baffling desire to fill what is actually quite a nice country in many ways with scum like this? I don't care if there's "no place for racism" in Scotland, whatever that even means; I wonder why there's a place for Muslim criminals who clearly despise the society they're preying on/leeching off/enriching, depending on your viewpoint.

The problem isn't racism as such; it's that treating the dregs of the Third World like kings feeds their entitlement and superioriy complexes - and if they happen to be Muslims, particularly younger Muslim males, those will probably be big enough as it is, despite little in the way of actual evidence for the truth of them.

The vibrant diversity seems destined to continue, however:

Muazim Ali Shah is accused of killing 47-year-old Lynne Farquhar at her flat in Rockmount Avenue, in the Barrhead area, on 26 September.

It is alleged that the 32-year-old repeatedly kicked and stamped on Ms Farquhar's head and body.

I wonder how many Scottish people the likes of Jim Murphy and Richard Baker will have on their consciences in the end?